Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nancy & Robert S Blank Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$414k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$201k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$627kArts & Culture$481kEducation$155kReligion$73kCommunity Improvement$23kRecreation & Sports$19kInternational$16kHuman Services$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $317k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Weill Cornell Medicine$201,000
Theatre Aspen$116,000
Aspen Valley Hospital$25,000
America Needs You$15,000
Aspen Music Festival and School$15,000
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center$10,000
Icahn School of Medicine$5,000
Congregation Emanu-El of the City of NY$4,800
Alzheimer's Association$3,000
Friends Seminary$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
The Aspen Institute$2,500
Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation$2,500
Planned Parenthood for the Rockies$2,000
The Chapin School$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%IBG Foundation: $250 → 11%Yamba Malawi: $8k → 17%Harlem Children's Zone: $500 → 17%WHEELING FORWARD: $500 → 17%Mount Sinai Health System: $800 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
AZ
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 34 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
47

Total granted

$1.1M
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

74%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $231k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THEATRE ASPEN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $389k · revenue +147%
  • TW
    THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $133k · revenue +8%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • HU
    HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • AC
    Aspen Commuity Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • WS
    WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samuel D Cozen Memorial Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesEducation Equity LeadershipFood Pantries & AssistanceChristian Missionary Organi…Community Health CentersIndependent K-8 SchoolsJewish Community FederationsElementary Literacy TutoringGovernment Accountability R…Community FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Land Conservation Organizat…Volunteer Fire DepartmentsYouth Development CentersProfessional Ballet Compani…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr20%15%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr14%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr20%5%20–35yr13%44%35–55yr14%45%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/57
the rest of the field
12%
4,924/40,376

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/52
Grantees still filing
31/52
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Weill Cornell Medicine — $201,000 · OtherWeill Cornell MedicineMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING — $70,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGIndividual grant recipient — $39,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $36,900 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF THE CITY OF NEW YOR…HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION — $30,000 · OtherAspen Valley Hospital — $25,000 · OtherAspen Commuity Foundation — $23,000 · OtherRODEPH SHALOM CONGREGATION — $20,000 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center — $20,000 · Other+44 more — $114,300 · Other+44 moreTHEATRE ASPEN — $388,999 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE ASPENMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $62,500 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC+5 more — $26,450 · Arts & Culture+5 moreICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $80,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $62,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE…AMERICA NEEDS YOU — $40,000 · EducationAMERICA NEEDS Y…+9 more — $20,100 · Education+9 moreTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $133,334 · HealthTHE WISTAR INS…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $18,500 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J …THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 · HealthTHE MULTIPLE M…+7 more — $16,600 · Health+7 moreCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $17,000 · Recreation & SportsSTREETSQUASH INC — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $550 · Recreation & SportsTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 · Social ScienceWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$579,600Arts & Culture$477,949Education$202,100Health$184,434Recreation & Sports$19,550Social Science$10,000Youth Development$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHEATRE ASPEN — $388,999 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $133,334 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $80,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $62,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $62,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA NEEDS YOU — $40,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $17,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER — $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFT INC — $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYAMBA MALAWI INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMenil Foundation Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN SANTA FE BALLET — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEnglish in Action — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe MHE Research Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMUEL D COZEN MEMORIAL FUND — $2,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIGESTIVE DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budget1898 FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO — $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR PARK AVENUE NEW YORK INC — $1,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEND ALLERGIES TOGETHER INC — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPHALT GREEN INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING FORWARD INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THEATRE ASPEN
  • Who funds THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
  • Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds AMERICA NEEDS YOU
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE
  • Who funds LIFT INC
  • Who funds YAMBA MALAWI INC
  • Who funds Menil Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ASPEN SANTA FE BALLET
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds THE WINDWARD SCHOOL
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC
  • Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds English in Action
  • Who funds The MHE Research Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nancy & Robert S Blank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph