Skip to content
Nalith Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Nalith Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$256kAnimals$98kHealth$69kEnvironment$36k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$3,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY$22,000
WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY$10,000
COALITION FOR HEALTHY SCHOOL FOOD$9,000
PLANT-BASED PREVENTION OF DISEASE$8,000
AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SAVE THE EARTH ECOCENTER$5,000
HEALTHY PLANET$5,000
CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY$4,500
THE VEGAN MUSEUM$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
NATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION$3,500
RESPONSIBLE EATING AND LIVING WW$3,000
OUR HEN HOUSE$3,000
COMPASSIONATE LIVING$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH VEG: $6k → 12%COMPASSIONATE LIVING: $4k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ: $3k → 13%GENTLE WORLD: $4k → 15%HEALTHY PLANET: $6k → 7%COALITION FOR HEALTHY SCHOOL FOOD: $10k → 9%NORTH AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $22k → 13%RESPONSIBLE EATING AND LIVING WW: $6k → 13%OUR HEN HOUSE: $3k → 14%WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10k → 16%ANIMAL OUTLOOK: $5k → 14%ANIMAL HERO KIDS: $3k → 10%THE VEGAN MUSEUM: $4k → 13%NARROW RIDGE: $6k → 17%GO VEGGIE: $6k → 14%AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $6k → 8%JEWISH VEG: $5k → 12%HEALTHY PLANET: $6k → 7%COALITION FOR HEALTHY SCHOOL FOOD: $9k → 9%NORTH AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $20k → 13%RESPONSIBLE EATING AND LIVING WW: $5k → 13%WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $7k → 16%ANIMAL OUTLOOK: $4k → 14%NARROW RIDGE: $6k → 17%GO VEGGIE: $4k → 14%AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $5k → 8%JEWISH VEGAN LIFE: $4k → 12%HEALTHY PLANET: $6k → 7%COALITION FOR HEALTHY SCHOOL FOOD: $8k → 9%NORTH AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $18k → 13%RESPONSIBLE EATING AND LIVING WW: $4k → 13%WOODSTOCK FARM SANCTUARY: $6k → 16%SAVE THE EARTH ECOCENTER: $5k → 15%NARROW RIDGE: $6k → 17%GO VEGGIE: $4k → 14%AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $5k → 8%HEALTHY PLANET: $5k → 7%COALITION FOR HEALTHY SCHOOL FOOD: $6k → 9%NORTH AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $13k → 13%RESPONSIBLE EATING AND LIVING WW: $4k → 13%WOODSTOCK FARM SANCTUARY: $5k → 16%SAVE THE EARTH ECOCENTER: $4k → 15%NARROW RIDGE: $5k → 17%CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $6k → 16%CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 16%CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 16%CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 16%CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$437k · 24 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

$437k
$9k

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsFood & NutritionEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue +12%
  • NH
    NATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $24k · revenue +72%
  • AV
    AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • CF
    CITIZENS FOR A BETTER S FL
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • TN
    TRUE NORTH HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary

Our mission at Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary is to provide a safe, loving and permanent home for rescued farmed animals whom are not accepted at most shelters. In addition to providing life-long care for the animals, we are dedicated to…

Animals
2
Middle East Vegan Society Inc

We firmly believe that the animal welfare and vegan community can significantly enhance their impact by extending their efforts to all corners of the world. Our dedication is to facilitate and contribute to this global outreach, striving…

—
3
Animal Place

To provide refuge for unwanted farmed animals, to further their welfare through education of the public and to foster ethics of compassion and responsibility towards nonhuman animals by advocating a vegan lifestyle.

Animals
4
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
5
The Vegan Awareness Foundation

Working to eliminate animal suffering, reduce environmental impacts, and improve human health through a vegan diet.

Education
6
Institute for Animal Happiness

Growing respect and acceptance for veganism through our dedicated work of rescue and creative care, impactful vegan food programs, vibrant education, and consistent advocacy; all strengthened by our engagement with a rising global network…

Animals
7
Happy Hen Animal Sanctuary
Animals
8
Animal & Vegan Advocacy International Inc

Animal and Vegan Advocacy International, Inc. is dedicated to creating a world in which animals are removed from the food system and other human uses. It furthers this mission by convening advocates through an international conference…

Animals
9
Vegan Coalition

This organization was formed to promote the vegan lifestyle and to promote respect and care for all animals.

Animals
10
Karma Farm Sanctuary Inc
Animals
11
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
12
Our Planet Theirs Too Inc

The organization advocates for animal rights and the vegan lifestyle, through its National Animal Rights Day (NARD) events and other projects that: 1. Promote the idea that animals have, and should have, the same basic rights that humans…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Animal Outlook Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charlies Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
7/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $73,000 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETYCOALITION FOR HEALTHY SCHOOL FOOD: $33,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR HEALTHY SCHOOL FOODIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHEALTHYPLANET: $22,500 · OtherHEALTHYPLANETRESPONSIBLE EATING AND LIVING WW: $21,000 · OtherRESPONSIBLE EATING AND LIVING WWAMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $19,500 · OtherAMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETYCLUB VEG: $14,000 · OtherCLUB VEGSAVE THE EARTH ECOCENTER: $13,500 · Other+13 more: $37,500 · Other+13 moreWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $27,000 · AnimalsWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL…CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $24,000 · AnimalsCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCT…ANIMAL OUTLOOK INC: $12,500 · AnimalsANIMAL OUTLOOK INCCompassionate Living: $10,000 · AnimalsCompassionate LivingOUR HEN HOUSE: $7,500 · AnimalsOUR HEN HOUSE+2 more: $4,000 · AnimalsPlant-based Prevention Of Disease Inc: $40,000 · Food & NutritionPlant-based Preve…GO VEGGIE INC: $16,000 · Food & NutritionGO VEGGIE INCCENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS: $13,500 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR JEWISH…NATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $24,000 · HealthCompassionate Actions Project Kind Veg Healthy Vegetarian Food Bank: $15,000 · Human ServicesANN WIGMORE NATURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE INC: $4,500 · EducationPeace Advocacy Network: $3,500 · Education
Other$257,000Animals$85,000Food & Nutrition$69,500Health$24,000Human Services$15,000Education$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPlant-based Prevention Of Disease Inc: $40,000 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $27,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $24,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $24,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $19,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetGO VEGGIE INC: $16,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetCENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS: $13,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetANIMAL OUTLOOK INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCompassionate Living: $10,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetOUR HEN HOUSE: $7,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetGENTLE WORLD INC: $7,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetANN WIGMORE NATURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPeace Advocacy Network: $3,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE VEGETARIAN RESOURCE GROUP: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCharlies Acres: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPIEDMONT FARM ANIMAL REFUGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Plant-based Prevention Of Disease Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GO VEGGIE INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassionate Actions Project Kind Veg Healthy Vegetarian Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL OUTLOOK INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassionate Living ↗
  • Who funds OUR HEN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GENTLE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds ANN WIGMORE NATURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Peace Advocacy Network ↗
  • Who funds THE VEGETARIAN RESOURCE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Charlies Acres ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT FARM ANIMAL REFUGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vegfund IncThe Quinn FoundationBradley L Goldberg Fa…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodFidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Vegfund IncDC28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vegfund Inc · The Quinn Foundation · Bradley L Goldberg Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nalith Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nalith Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nalith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home