Skip to content

· Private foundation

Myrtle E & Wm G Hess Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$393k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$894kHealth$640kHuman Services$573kEducation$367k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $301k
$43,473
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PATRICK PARISH$100,000
CHRIST MEDICUS FOUNDATION$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT$65,000
OPENDOOR OUTREACH CENTER$60,500
MOTHER AND UNBORN BABY CARE INC$43,473
GUEST HOUSE INC$20,000
MARIAN HIGH SCHOOL$12,000
MERCY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST VINCENT AND SARAH FISHER center: $10k → 21%ST VINCENT AND SARAH FISHER center: $5k → 21%ST VINCENT AND SARAH FISHER CENTER: $5k → 21%ST VINCENT AND SARAH FISHER CENTER: $5k → 21%ST VINCENT AND SARAH FISHER center: $5k → 21%ST VINCENT AND SARAH FISHER center: $5k → 21%ANGELS PLACE: $60k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $60k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $55k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $55k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $50k → 8%OPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER: $10k → 8%OPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER: $10k → 8%OPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 16 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$2.3M
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

44%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    ANGELS' PLACE
    5× · 2018–2022 · $280k · revenue +79%
  • CM
    CHRIST MEDICUS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $220k · revenue +46%
  • MA
    Mother and Unborn Baby Care Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $173k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • DO
    Daughters of Divine Charity
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • LH
    LOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -121%
  • MJ
    MANRESA JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lourdes Assisted Living Corporation

Lourdes senior community, inspired by the gospel of jesus and sponsored by the dominican sisters of peace, provides a broad continuum of care for seniors and their families. all who administer at lourdes honor the uniqueness of each person…

—
2
St Anne's Nursing Center St Anne's Residence Inc

The organization provides nursing and assisted care to individuals of all faiths regardless of ability to pay.

Health
3
Marian Manor Inc

To provide extended care to the chronically ill and disabled, with special emphasis on the care of the frail elderly.

Health
4
St Augustine Manor

St. Augustine Health Ministries continues the healing ministry of Christ by promoting the quality of life and independence of each person entrusted to our care through a continuum of health care and related services to the chronically ill…

Human Services
5
Divine Mercy Ministries Inc

Divine Mercy Ministries, Inc. is a Christian maternity home for women 18 years of age and older facing unexpected pregnancies. Open to women of all faiths, it provides a loving and nurturing environment to meet the spiritual, physical,…

Religion
6
Marian House Inc

Marian house is a holistic, healing community for women and their children who are in need of housing and support services. we provide a safe, sober, and loving environment that challenges women to respect and love themselves, confront…

Human Services
7
Sancta Maria Hospital Inc

Faithful to the spirit of the congregation of the daughters of mary, sancta maria nursing facility's mission is to witness christ's compassion, caring and love, reflecting the catholic church's role in the continuation of christ's healing…

—
8
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
9
Morris Health Services

We are committed to expressing christ's love by providing care that values every human life. st francis health services controls and operates morris health services and is sponsored by the catholic diocese of st cloud. we are dedicated to…

—
10
St Joseph's Nursing Home Sisters Servants of Mary Immaculate

44-bed licensed skilled nursing home in catonsville, maryland that provides nursing care services to its residents.

—
11
Mariners Inn

To provide 24-hour residential substance abuse treatment for adult homeless men in a professional, compassionate, and therapeutic environment conducive to reducing drug and alcohol addiction and promoting their return to health,…

Health
12
St Bernards Healthcare Inc

To provide christ-like healing to the community through education, treatment and health services. see schedule o for additional information. since 1900, st bernards has served as our community's trusted provider of comprehensive,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lourdes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mother and Unborn Baby Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PATRICKS PARISH: $751,312 · OtherST PATRICKS PARISHUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT: $155,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUITMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $99,000 · OtherMARIAN HIGH SCHOOLTRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN DBA: $87,000 · OtherTRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN DBASOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $79,444 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAULMERCY HIGH SCHOOL: $78,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER: $70,500 · Other+11 more: $147,337 · Other+11 moreMother and Unborn Baby Care Inc: $173,473 · HealthMother and Unborn …GUEST HOUSE INC: $160,000 · HealthGUEST HOUSE INCLOURDES INC: $67,950 · HealthLOURDES INCANGELS' PLACE: $280,000 · Human ServicesANGELS' PLACEST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER: $35,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT & SA…OPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR OUTRE…CHRIST MEDICUS FOUNDATION: $220,000 · ReligionCHRIST MED…ABIDE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · ReligionLOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationADRIAN REA LITERACY CENTER: $15,000 · Education
Other$1,467,593Health$401,423Human Services$345,000Religion$230,000Education$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANGELS' PLACE: $280,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCHRIST MEDICUS FOUNDATION: $220,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetMother and Unborn Baby Care Inc: $173,473 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetGUEST HOUSE INC: $160,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetLOURDES INC: $67,950 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER: $35,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetABIDE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMARYGROVE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANGELS' PLACE ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST MEDICUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mother and Unborn Baby Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds GUEST HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOURDES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADRIAN REA LITERACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ABIDE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYGROVE COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Foundation of MichiganMI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Foundation of Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · John D & Jean E Dinan Foundation · William and Marie Molnar Foundation Corp · The Sehn Foundation · Molinello Family Foundation · Isabel Francis Smith and Ralph Lawrence Smith Foundation · Pat and Gerry Carroll Charitable Foundation · Pulte Family Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Myrtle E & Wm G Hess Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Myrtle E & Wm G Hess Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Myrtle E & Wm G Hess’ filings →

    More from the funding graph