Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sehn Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$569kHuman Services$247kYouth Development$193kHealth$162kEducation$114kPhilanthropy$22kCommunity Improvement$15kFood & Nutrition$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY$100,000
GUEST HOUSE$10,000
ST HUGO OF THE HILLS CHURCH$5,000
MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM$5,000
ST HUGO OF THE HILLS CHURCH$5,000
KIRK GIBSON FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S$5,000
MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM$2,500
ST HUGO OF THE HILLS CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $5k → 21%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DETROIT: $5k → 21%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DETROIT: $5k → 21%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DETROIT: $1k → 21%ANGEL'S PLACE: $50k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $50k → 8%ANGEL'S PLACE: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 19 repeat orgs$307k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
24

Total granted

$1.0M
$292k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+37%

Still filing today

37%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $188k · revenue +120%
  • AP
    ANGELS' PLACE
    3× · 2017–2020 · $150k · revenue +84%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT
    3× · 2018–2023 · $11k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • TH
    TRINITY HEALTH OAKLAND
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • SC
    SAMARITAN CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +113%
  • NS
    NATIONAL SHRINE OF THE LITTLE FLOWER BASILICA PARISH ROYAL OAK
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Advantage Healthsaint Mary's Medical Group

We, advantage health/saint mary's medical group and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.advantage health/saint mary's medical group…

Health
2
Samaritan Hospital

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. samaritan hospital is a member of st. peter's health partners and…

Health
3
Rose Hill Center Inc

To provide a residential psychiatric rehabilitation facility for adults with mental illness

Health
4
St Francis Home of Saginaw

Skilled nursing care for the elderly.

5
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

We, trinity health grand haven hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity health grand haven hospital is a member of trinity…

Health
6
Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw Founda

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
7
St Joseph Mercy Chelsea Inc

We, st. joseph mercy chelsea and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph mercy chelsea is a member of trinity health - michigan and…

Health
8
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

9
Mercy Health Partners

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy health partners is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

10
Villa Mary Immaculate

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. villa mary immaculate is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Health
11
St John's Rehabilitation Hospital and Nursing Center Inc

St. john's rehabilitation hospital provides nursing and rehabilitation services to individuals of all faiths, regardless of any individuals' ability to pay for services, including routine and ancillary care, in support of the archiocese of…

Health
12
Mercy Services Downtown Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society of St Vincent De Paul in the Archdiocese of Detroit and the most unlike its peers is The Bottomless Toy Chest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%13%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr13%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%55%20–35yr12%1%35–55yr13%37%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
17%
2,976/17,286

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY — $235,000 · OtherCHRIST CHILD SOCIETYMANRESA JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE — $120,000 · OtherMANRESA JESUIT RETREAT HOUSETRINITY HEALTH OAKLAND — $100,000 · OtherTRINITY HEALTH OAKLANDUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUIT — $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT JESUITST HUGO OF THE HILLS — $72,500 · OtherST HUGO OF THE HILLSST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND — $60,000 · OtherST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLANDST HUGO OF THE HILLS PARISH BLOOMFIELD HILLS — $38,000 · Other+25 more — $203,976 · Other+25 moreTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM — $187,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MIDNIGHT GOL…+1 more — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentANGELS' PLACE — $150,000 · Human ServicesANGELS' PLACESOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT — $11,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST…+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesGUEST HOUSE INC — $10,000 · HealthTHE PINK AGENDA INC — $10,000 · HealthTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $10,000 · HealthSACRED HEART REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $5,500 · HealthSAMARITAN CENTER INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementTHE HILL SCHOOL CORPORATION OF MIDDLEBURG — $20,000 · EducationROSE HILL FOUNDATION — $6,000 · PhilanthropyFALLEN AND WOUNDED SOLDIERS FUND — $5,500 · Philanthropy
Other$904,476Youth Development$192,500Human Services$166,000Health$35,500Community Improvement$25,000Education$20,000Philanthropy$11,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM — $187,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetANGELS' PLACE — $150,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAN CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUEST HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PINK AGENDA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSE HILL FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFALLEN AND WOUNDED SOLDIERS FUND — $5,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSACRED HEART REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRACQUET UP DETROIT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPOPE FRANCIS CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPK CHARITIES CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM
  • Who funds ANGELS' PLACE
  • Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL CORPORATION OF MIDDLEBURG
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT
  • Who funds GUEST HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE PINK AGENDA INC
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN
  • Who funds ROSE HILL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FALLEN AND WOUNDED SOLDIERS FUND
  • Who funds SACRED HEART REHABILITATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT
  • Who funds THE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC
  • Who funds POPE FRANCIS CENTER
  • Who funds MOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI28.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Catholic Foundation of Michigan · Henry Ford Southeast Michigan Community Health · Thomas J & Ruth E Grimaldi Foundation · James M and Louise C Roche Foundation · Molinello Family Foundation · Raymond M & Jane E Cracchiolo Foundation · Myrtle E & Wm G Hess Charitable Trust · Doris J & Donald L Duchene Foundation C/O David Findling · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Dte Energy Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sehn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph