Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mylan Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.0MEducation$2.9MRecreation & Sports$2.3MPhilanthropy$1.1MInternational$1.0MHuman Services$887kPublic Safety & Disaster$700kFood & Nutrition$300kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $167k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$333,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mylan Park Foundation Inc$333,000
Mylan Park Foundation Inc$167,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $837k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $70k → 9%HEKIMA PLACE INC: $370k → 11%GOLDEN GIRL INC: $25k → 18%SAFE HORIZON INC: $25k → 17%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INC: $25k → 15%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION INC: $25k → 12%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 12%OPERATION WELCOME HOME: $10k → 19%HEKIMA PLACE INC: $32k → 11%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $100k → 19%CHRISTIAN IMMIGRATION ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 11%WOMENS CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PGH: $30k → 11%CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
SD
PA
CA
KY
WV
VA
DC
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Mylan Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mylan Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 22 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
68

Total granted

$6.1M
$5.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +481%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $650k · revenue +11%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $500k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CH
    CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue +45%
  • TS
    THE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +21%
  • SA
    SEWICKLEY ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
3
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
4
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Greater Washington Partnership

We identify shared opportunities and core challenges and offer solutions to the region's most critical issues including skills and talent, regional mobility, infrastructure and inclusive economic growth.

Recreation & Sports
9
Waynesboro Hospital

Waynesboro hospital is a regional nonprofit healthcare organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
10
The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology

The mission of the wistar institute is to marshal the talents of outstanding scientists through a highly enabled culture of biomedical collaboration and innovation in order to solve some of the world's most challenging and important…

Health
11
Wesley Spectrum Services

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care .

Human Services
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caring Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/85
Grantees still filing
61/85
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC: $2,250,000 · EducationMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $705,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $650,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHSEWICKLEY ACADEMY: $250,000 · EducationRECONNECTING MCDOWELL INC: $250,000 · EducationSHADY SIDE ACADEMY: $250,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · Education+8 more: $565,000 · Education+8 moreCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $500,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL …CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL INC: $500,000 · HealthCABELL HUNTINGTON HOS…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $300,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital L…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $165,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL O…THE PATIENT HELPLINE FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · HealthTHE PATIENT HELPLINE …A CALL TO CARE INC: $140,000 · HealthA CALL TO CARE INCAMERICAN AUTOIMMUNE RELATED DISEASES ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · HealthDIABETES LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $100,000 · HealthUPMC Washington: $100,000 · Health+10 more: $401,000 · Health+10 moreYOUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WV INC: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyYOUR COMMU…NORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $80,000 · Philanthropy+4 moreJames R Jordan Foundation International: $500,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $200,000 · InternationalBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $100,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES Living Proof C: $200,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSP…UPMC: $200,000 · OtherUPMCHEALTHY START INC: $100,000 · OtherHEALTHY START I…BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherBLUECHECK CHARI…WEST VIRGINIA BROADCASTING FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $100,000 · OtherMOUNTAINEER FOO…412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $100,000 · Other412 FOOD RESCUE…NEVILLE HOUSE ASSOCIATES INC: $119,310 · OtherNEVILLE HOUSE A…THE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS: $65,500 · OtherOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $80,000 · Other+23 more: $697,500 · Other+23 moreHEKIMA PLACE INC: $401,500 · Human ServicesLEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $105,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN HELP INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $70,000 · Human ServicesLibera Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $30,000 · Human Services+7 more: $130,000 · Human ServicesTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $500,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $100,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$5,120,000Health$2,456,000Philanthropy$1,170,000International$1,000,000Other$1,832,310Human Services$886,500Public Safety & Disaster$600,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC: $2,250,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetYOUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WV INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $705,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $650,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $500,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHEKIMA PLACE INC: $401,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEWICKLEY ACADEMY: $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRECONNECTING MCDOWELL INC: $250,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSHADY SIDE ACADEMY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $165,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PATIENT HELPLINE FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetA CALL TO CARE INC: $140,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEVILLE HOUSE ASSOCIATES INC: $119,310 over 4y, 37% of budgetLEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $105,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetAMERICAN AUTOIMMUNE RELATED DISEASES ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIABETES LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTHY START INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCR JRS CHIP: $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPMC Washington: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELP INC: $100,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWV GAME CHANGERS INC: $75,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS: $65,500 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH AND MORGANTOWN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLibera Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetLAURENS WISH ADDICTION TRIAGE CENTE: $50,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetCITIZENS LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON: $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVETERANS LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA44.5× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Eqt Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Equitrans Midstream Foundation · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Upmc Group · Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr · Firstenergy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mylan Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mylan Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mylan Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mylan Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mylan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph