Skip to content
Music & Dance Foundation Inc Co Abruzzo Accounting LLC at a glance

· Private foundation

Music & Dance Foundation Inc Co Abruzzo Accounting LLC

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$207k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.3MEducation$65kSocial Science$40kReligion$22kFood & Nutrition$20kHealth$18kOther$0
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $195k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION$30,000
MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER FOR DANCE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CHASE BROCK EXPERIENCE INC$20,000
ABRAHAM IN MOTION INC$18,000
FRACTURED ATLAS INC MARK BURKE$15,000
THRESHOLD DANCE PROJECTS INC$15,000
WORKS IN PROCESS INC PONTUS$15,000
DANCE RING INC$12,000
ALLISON COOK BEATTY DANCE INC$10,000
FRACTURED ATLAS INC$8,000
IVY BALDWIN INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY26–26, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ABRAHAM IN MOTION INC: $18k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 22 repeat orgs$865k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
59

Total granted

$1.1M
$803k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

77%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PD
    PARSONS DANCE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $70k · revenue +93%
  • TD
    THE DANCE RING INC
    5× · 2020–2026 · $57k · revenue +55%
  • BARD COLLEGE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $55k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • MG
    MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles International Dance Festival
—
2
The Harkness Foundation for Dance Inc
—
3
Tickle the Sleeping Giant Inc

To create contemporary dance works

Arts & Culture
4
Alma Nyc Dance Company Inc
Arts & Culture
5
Litvak Dance Arts Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Ballet Folklorico De Barajas
Arts & Culture
7
Barkha Dance Company Inc

Creating, Performing & Sharing Powerful classical dance Kathak

Arts & Culture
8
Pony Box Dance Theater

Pony Box Dance Theatre is a 21st century digital dream of Homeric athleticism with Olympian execution. An artful, moving exploration of men in dance, Pony Box Dance Theater aspires to bring the joy and beauty of dance to all people.Our…

Arts & Culture
9
Judah Performing Arts Company

Support dancers and the performing arts

Arts & Culture
10
Flyaway Productions

Flyaway productions is an apparatus-based dance company that offers performance and dance training to the public. integrating risk, spectacle and social potency, the company offers dance perfornamces as a medium for female empowerment in…

Arts & Culture
11
Adele Myers and Dancers

Adele Myers and Dancers is a professional national touring dance theater company that suppports Miami-based dance artists at early stages of their careers by offering a commission for new work, mentorship, and performance opportunities in…

Public Benefit
12
Dancing Through Bri

Dance scholarships

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joyce Theater Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Seventh Regiment Armory Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
24/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARTHA GRAHAM CENER OF COMTEMPORY DANCE: $80,000 · OtherMARTHA GRAHAM CENER OF COMTEMPORY DANCEIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE DANCE RING INC: $57,000 · OtherTHE DANCE RING INC10 HAIRY LEGS: $57,000 · Other10 HAIRY LEGSIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherMARTHA GRAHAM CENTER FOR DANCE: $50,000 · OtherMARTHA GRAHAM CENTER: $40,000 · Other+40 more: $523,000 · Other+40 moreTHE CHASE BROCK EXPERIENCE INC: $90,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHASE BROCK EXPERIENCE INCJOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $73,500 · Arts & CultureJOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION INCPARSONS DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Arts & CulturePARSONS DANCE FOUNDATION INCALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INCFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INCJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE INC: $45,000 · Arts & CulturePAUL TAYLOR DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureWORKS AND PROCESS INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureThreshold Dance Projects Inc: $35,000 · Arts & CulturePILOBOLUS INC: $31,000 · Arts & CultureGALLIM DANCE COMPANY INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+22 more: $265,000 · Arts & Culture+22 moreBARD COLLEGE: $55,000 · EducationHelen Simoneau Danse Inc: $16,000 · EducationAbraham In Motion Inc: $18,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Religion
Other$977,000Arts & Culture$874,500Education$71,000Human Services$18,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHASE BROCK EXPERIENCE INC: $90,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetJOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $73,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPARSONS DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE DANCE RING INC: $57,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budget10 HAIRY LEGS: $57,000 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPAUL TAYLOR DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWORKS AND PROCESS INC: $40,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetThreshold Dance Projects Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetPILOBOLUS INC: $31,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGALLIM DANCE COMPANY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetDOVA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetDANCE HEGINBOTHAM INC: $23,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetDANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSBDNY Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetMORBALLET INC: $17,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetHelen Simoneau Danse Inc: $16,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetPERIAPSIS MUSIC AND DANCE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetSEVENTH REGIMENT ARMORY CONSERVANCY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIQUE PROJECTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNIMBUS DANCE WORKS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANCE IQUAIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLOS ANGELES PERFORMANCE PRACTICE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE EQUUS PROJECTS INC DANCING WITH HORSES: $8,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCalpulli Mexican Dance Company Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMIND TO MOVE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetMATTHEW WESTERBY DANCE COMPANY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetYaa Samar Dance Theatre: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetDORRANCE DANCE INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARIEL RIVKA DANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHASE BROCK EXPERIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARSONS DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DANCE RING INC ↗
  • Who funds 10 HAIRY LEGS ↗
  • Who funds ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL TAYLOR DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKS AND PROCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Threshold Dance Projects Inc ↗
  • Who funds PILOBOLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds GALLIM DANCE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds DOVA INC ↗
  • Who funds DANCE HEGINBOTHAM INC ↗
  • Who funds DANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Abraham In Motion Inc ↗
  • Who funds SBDNY Inc ↗
  • Who funds MORBALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds Helen Simoneau Danse Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harkness Foundati…The Howard Gilman Fou…New England Foundatio…Arnhold Foundation IncNew Music USA IncThe Shubert Foundatio…Mid Atlantic Arts IncThe Charles and Joan …Dance Service New Yor…The Fan Fox and Lesli…Jerome Robbins Founda…Rockefeller Brothers …
The Harkness Foundation for Dance IncNY38.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harkness Foundation for Dance Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · Arnhold Foundation Inc · New Music USA Inc · The Shubert Foundation Inc · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · The Charles and Joan Gross Family Foundation · Dance Service New York City Inc · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · Jerome Robbins Foundation · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Music & Dance Foundation Inc Co Abruzzo Accounting LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Music & Dance Foundation Inc Co Abruzzo Accounting LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Nimbus Dance Works Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Pilobolus Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Music & Dance Foundation Inc Co Abruzzo Accounting LLC?

Find your warmest path to Music & Dance Foundation Inc Co Abruzzo Accounting LLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Music & Dance Foundation Inc Co Abruzzo Accounting LLC’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home