Skip to content

· Private foundation

Murphy Charitable Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$508k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$2.8MHealth$1.2MReligion$809kFood & Nutrition$465kRecreation & Sports$327kHuman Services$31kEmployment$10kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $380k
$31,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Food Bank of Iowa$145,000
West Virginia University Foundation$100,000
Cyclone Regional Training Center$85,000
We Will Collective$50,000
Twin Lakes Golf Course$32,200
Wartburg College$31,500
Hope Lutheran Church$30,000
Powerhouse Foundation$23,000
American Cancer Society$7,500
Polk City Community Foundation$2,500
Children's Tumor Foundation$1,000
Waterloo Christian School$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Freed People: $25k → 11%Wings of Refuge: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 14 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$4.3M
$178k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+48%

Still filing today

57%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEmploymentReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +49%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF IOWA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $465k · revenue +9%
  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2023 · $450k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CI
    CHILDSERVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +114%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • AF
    Ankeny First United Methodist Churc
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
5
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
6
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
Barclay College

The mission of barclay college is to prepare students in a bible-centered environment for effective christian life, service, and leadership.

Education
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Freed People. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WARTBURG COLLEGE: $1,213,875 · EducationWARTBURG COLLEGEIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · EducationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $450,000 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITYCYCLONE REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER INC: $145,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationTwin Lakes Bible Camp: $660,000 · OtherTwin Lakes Bible CampWE WILL COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED: $100,000 · OtherWE WILL COLLECTIVE INC…American Cancer Society: $65,550 · OtherAmerican Cancer Societ…Fort Dodge Community Schools: $55,000 · OtherHope Lutheran Church: $55,000 · OtherCHILDSERVE INC: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · Other+10 more: $105,950 · Other+10 moreMAYO CLINIC: $1,100,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+1 more: $1,000 · HealthFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $465,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK…Powerhouse Foundation: $68,000 · ReligionFreed People: $25,000 · Human ServicesWINGS OF REFUGE: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRANK TOWN OPEN HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $5,000 · Employment
Education$2,908,875Other$1,141,500Health$1,101,000Food & Nutrition$465,000Religion$68,000Human Services$30,000Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE: $1,213,875 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $465,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $450,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCYCLONE REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER INC: $145,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetWE WILL COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPowerhouse Foundation: $68,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetCHILDSERVE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFreed People: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRANK TOWN OPEN HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWINGS OF REFUGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WARTBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CYCLONE REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WE WILL COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Powerhouse Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDSERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Freed People ↗
  • Who funds VARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds FRANK TOWN OPEN HEARTS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Murphy Charitable Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Murphy Charitable Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Murphy Charitable Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph