Skip to content
Murad Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Murad Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$110kHuman Services$110kHealth$48kYouth Development$37kEnvironment$33kArts & Culture$30kHousing & Shelter$20kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OCEANOGRAPHIC TEACHING STATIONS$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $5k → 14%REDISCOVER CENTER: $3k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $90k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79k · 4 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
33

Total granted

$79k
$332k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+49%

Still filing today

75%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WN
    WESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $29k · revenue +117%
  • VS
    VISTAMAR SCHOOL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $26k · revenue -2%
  • S
    SOSMENTOR
    2× · 2017–2018 · $13k · revenue -78%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2017 · $90k · revenue -2%
  • ES
    EL SEGUNDO EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +33%
  • EC
    EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
2
Terra Marin School

Our mission is to spark wonder and intellectual curiosity in each child. We achieve this through a purposeful blend of:Engaging academics custom-tailored to each child's abilities, strengths and interests;An unparalleled social-emotional…

Education
3
Institute for Applied Tinkering

Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.

Youth Development
4
Hollywood Schoolhouse Inc

Hollywood Schoolhouse knows, values, and encourages fearless curiosity. Through a blended program of innovative academics and structured learning, our diverse community inspires students to be academically strong, artistically proud,…

Education
5
Crossroads School for Arts and Sciences

Crossroads is an independent school for approximately 1,200 students.

Education
6
The Santa Ynez Valley Family School

The family school is dedicated to providing a superior environment of child centered academic and creative programs which inspire a joy of learning and support critical thinking. we strive to prepare students to be compassionate,…

Education
7
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
8
The Mirman School for Gifted Children

We cultivate the boundless potential of highly gifted children, nurture their passions and talents, and develop a diverse community of creative and constructive lifelong learners.

Education
9
Communities in Schools of Los Angeles Inc

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…

Youth Development
10
Inner-City Arts

Inner-city arts believes that the arts and creativity are transformational, and we envision a society that honors the human capacity for creativity, and values its cultivation in the education of young people. inner-city arts uses arts…

Arts & Culture
11
Yuba River Charter School

Yuba River Charter School provides K-8 public Waldorf education that nurtures the physical, emotional and intellectual capacities of the child through a developmentally appropriate curriculum. YRCS brings forth the academic, social,…

Education
12
La Scuola International School

Inspire brave learners to shape the future.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Center of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is Saturday Night Bath Concert Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
23/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $90,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISC…EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERNGOLDEN HEART RANCH: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesEL SEGUNDO EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherEL SEGUNDO EDUCATION FOUNDATIONSOSMENTOR: $12,500 · OtherSOSMENTORBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $10,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $8,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSJEWISH BIG BROTHER AND BIG SISTER: $5,000 · OtherROUNDHOUSE AQUARIUM: $5,000 · OtherMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER: $5,000 · OtherCounsel for Justice: $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LA: $5,000 · OtherPS I Love You Foundation: $7,500 · OtherPS I Love You FoundationVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,000 · Other+5 more: $9,250 · Other+5 moreWESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL: $28,500 · EducationWESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOO…VISTAMAR SCHOOL: $26,000 · EducationVISTAMAR SCHOOLMANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationMANHATTAN BEACH EDUC…Oceanographic Teaching Stations Inc: $7,500 · EducationOceanographic Teachi…ACCESS BOOKS: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationVENICE ARTS: $12,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH BAY ARTIST COLLECTIVE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFree Arts dba Free Arts for Abused Children: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSATURDAY NIGHT BATH CONCERT FUND: $2,500 · Arts & CultureGRADES OF GREEN INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentHEAL THE BAY: $10,000 · EnvironmentCAMP TAMARACK: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS ENJOY EXERCISE NOW LOS ANGELES CO DENTONS: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentHumane World for Animals Inc: $10,000 · Animals
Human Services$147,500Other$117,250Education$77,500Arts & Culture$29,500Environment$20,000Youth Development$17,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $90,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEL SEGUNDO EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL: $28,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVISTAMAR SCHOOL: $26,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOSMENTOR: $12,500 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetVENICE ARTS: $12,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGRADES OF GREEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BAY ARTIST COLLECTIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPS I Love You Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetOceanographic Teaching Stations Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGOLDEN HEART RANCH: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP TAMARACK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCounsel for Justice: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFree Arts dba Free Arts for Abused Children: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetACCESS BOOKS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGROWINGGREAT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT ECHO: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetREDISCOVER CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Annenberg Foundat…The Ahmanson Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…Image Solutions Gives…Pipkin Charitable Fou…Robert a Waller Found…The Rose Hills Founda…Elbridge Stuart Found…The J Paul Getty TrustLiberty Hill Foundati…The Northrop Grumman …
California Community FoundationCA34.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Image Solutions Gives Back · Pipkin Charitable Foundation · Robert a Waller Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Northrop Grumman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Murad Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Murad Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Murad Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home