Skip to content
Mungo Homes Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Mungo Homes Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$422k
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$374kHousing & Shelter$130kHealth$125kReligion$78kFood & Nutrition$52kEducation$45kAnimals$42kPhilanthropy$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $331k
$9,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS$36,000
CENTRAL CHILDREN'S HOME OF NC$34,130
HOME WORKS OF AMERICA$32,500
BIG RED BARN RETREAT$25,000
A BED AND A BOOK$20,000
UPSTATE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$19,000
INTERACT$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
SHINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN GVILL$14,000
NORTH STRAND HOUSING CENTER$10,000
CAMP RISE ABOVE$10,000
VETERANS WELCOME HOME RES CTR$10,000
THE BACKPACK PROJECT DURHAM$10,000
SAFE HARBOR$10,000
MANNA HOUSE MINISTRIES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $233k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARLOTTE: $5k → 10%MANNA HOUSE MINISTRIES: $10k → 9%M4K RICHMOND: $3k → 7%EMMANUWHEEL: $10k → 11%UPSTATE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $19k → 15%CANINES FOR SERVICE: $5k → 12%WINGS OF HOPE RANCH: $1k → 5%M4K RICHMOND: $3k → 7%UPSTATE FAMILY RESOURCE: $18k → 15%M4K RICHMOND: $3k → 7%UPSTATE FAMILY RESOURCE: $15k → 15%HOME WORKS OF AMERICA: $33k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS: $36k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS: $30k → 16%BIG RED BARN RETREAT: $25k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS: $18k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$602k · 22 repeat orgs$414k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
20

Total granted

$602k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+35%

Still filing today

77%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $273k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionReligionRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +4%
  • RM
    Reconciliation Ministries Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $53k · revenue +49% · 29% of their budget
  • E
    EMMANUWHEEL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $48k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • BL
    BUDDY LEONARD 529 PLAN
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • MJ
    MICHAEL J MUNGO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +35%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Nc Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity of North Carolina…

Housing & Shelter
2
Bridge of Hope Ministries Inc

Provide safe & loving home for children

Human Services
3
Southern Comfort Animal Rescue Inc

Southern Comfort Animal Rescue, Inc. is 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that rescues and rehomes abused, unwanted and abandoned companion animals.Southern Comfort was founded in 2001 in Savannah, Georgia, to provide shelter and find…

Animals
4
Rebuilding Together of Greater Charlotte

The mission of Rebuilding Together of Greater Charlotte is repairing homes, revitalizing communities, rebuilding lives.We mobilize community volunteers and contractors to provide repairs that make homes safer and healthier for…

Housing & Shelter
5
Kings Ranch of Jonesboro Inc

King's ranch is a privately funded, nonprofit, nondenominational christian children's home organized to provide hope for adopted children and their families who are at risk of disruption because of the trauma the child incurred from abuse,…

Human Services
6
Carolina Childrens Home

The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families

Human Services
7
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
9
Operation Rebuild Hope

Operation Rebuild Hope serves veterans by providing fast-tracked housing solutions and support services to those in need

Public Benefit
10
Wounded Warriors of Mississippi

Wounded Warriors of Mississippi provides support to post-9/11 veterans by addressing critical needs related to housing, financial hardship, and overall well-being. The organization assists veterans through home repairs such as roof repair,…

Health
11
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
12
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Welcome Home Angel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Michael J Mungo Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
25/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC: $61,782 · OtherTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INCBUDDY LEONARD 529 PLAN: $44,580 · OtherBUDDY LEONARD 529 PLANCENTRAL CHILDREN'S HOME OF NC: $34,130 · OtherCENTRAL CHILDREN'S HOME OF NCHELP FOR KIDS: $19,800 · OtherMICHAEL J MUNGO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherVETERANS WELCOME HOME AND RESOURCE CENTER: $20,000 · Other+45 more: $277,354 · Other+45 moreFAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS INC: $84,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS INCUPSTATE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $52,000 · Human ServicesUPSTATE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTEREMMANUWHEEL: $48,000 · Human ServicesEMMANUWHEELSAFE HARBOR INC: $43,500 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR INCHOME WORKS OF AMERICA INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesHOME WORKS OF AMERICA INCBIG RED BARN RETREAT: $25,000 · Human ServicesBIG RED BARN RETREATMy Sister's House Inc: $14,000 · Human Services+6 more: $39,000 · Human Services+6 moreReconciliation Ministries Inc: $52,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $36,000 · Food & NutritionNourishNC Inc: $8,500 · Food & NutritionFEED MORE INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionA BED AND A BOOK: $32,500 · Community ImprovementK9 Battle Buddies: $20,000 · AnimalsADOPT AN ANGEL: $10,000 · AnimalsSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $28,600 · Health
Other$482,646Human Services$338,000Religion$57,500Food & Nutrition$47,000Community Improvement$32,500Animals$30,000Health$28,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS INC: $84,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC: $61,782 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetReconciliation Ministries Inc: $52,500 over 2y, 29% of budgetUPSTATE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $52,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetEMMANUWHEEL: $48,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC: $43,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOME WORKS OF AMERICA INC: $32,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetA BED AND A BOOK: $32,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $28,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMICHAEL J MUNGO FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBIG RED BARN RETREAT: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVETERANS WELCOME HOME AND RESOURCE CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetK9 Battle Buddies: $20,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMy Sister's House Inc: $14,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNION MISSION INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCAMP RISE ABOVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetADOPT AN ANGEL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJUMPSTART SOUTH CAROLINA: $9,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNourishNC Inc: $8,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetM4K RICHMOND INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc: $7,599 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREAL CHAMPIONS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCanines for Service Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALMETTO PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEROES ON HORSEBACK: $4,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCAMP HAPPY DAYS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRALEIGH AREA LAND TRUST: $3,900 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS MAKING IT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDAILY BREAD MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWings of Hope Ranch Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELCOME HOME ANGEL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Comm…Dominion Energy Chari…Truist Foundation IncCoastal Community Fou…North Carolina Commun…The Joanna FoundationMichael J Mungo Found…New Hanover Community…Henry & Sylvia Yaschi…The Landfall Foundati…United Community Bank…Duke Energy Foundation
Central Carolina Community FoundationSC28.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · The Joanna Foundation · Michael J Mungo Foundation · New Hanover Community Endowment Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · The Landfall Foundation Inc · United Community Bank Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mungo Homes Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mungo Homes Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mungo Homes Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mungo Homes Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mungo Homes’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home