Skip to content
Mrm Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Mrm Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$83kEducation$68kEnvironment$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$6kAnimals$3kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
UPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$10,000
ISLAND DOLPHIN CARE$5,000
TRINITY COLLEGE$2,500
HENRY FOUNDATION FOR BOTANICAL$2,500
PAWS FOR LIFE$2,500
WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $1k → 6%KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 7 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
16

Total granted

$158k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+16%

Still filing today

71%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +21%
  • CC
    CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +9%
  • TH
    THE HENRY FOUNDATION FOR BOTANICAL RESEARCH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • BF
    BERWYN FIRE COMPANYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +394%
  • LC
    LIVING CLASSROOMS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • T
    THORNCRAFT
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
French and Pickering Creeks Conservation Trust Inc

To preserve, steward, and connect people to the land in northern chester county pennsylvania. see additional information on schedule o.french & pickering is recognized as a leader in regional land conservation, the organization is…

Environment
2
The Winchester Foundation
—
3
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
4
The Diller-Von Furstenberg Family Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Christopher Catanese Childrens Foundation
Philanthropy
6
The William Penn Foundation
—
7
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
8
The Katherine Bakeless Wildflower & Nature Preserve Inc
—
9
Chandor Gardens Foundation
Community Improvement
10
Canterbury School Inc

Canterbury school is pk3-12, coeducational, college preparatory day school with approximately 650 students. the school is dedicated to academic excellence within a caring and supportive community emphasizing character, leadership and…

Education
11
West Colebrook Farm Company
Arts & Culture
12
Henry C Lord Scholarship Fd
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kennett Area Community Service; the most unlike its peers is The Henry Foundation for Botanical Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE OCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER: $75,000 · OtherTHE OCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTERWILLISTON CONSERVATION TRUST: $10,000 · OtherWILLISTON CONSERVATION TRUSTTHE HENRY FOUNDATION FOR BOTANICAL RESEARCH: $6,000 · OtherLIVING CLASSROOMS: $5,000 · OtherTHORNCRAFT: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $20,000 · Other+9 moreUPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationUPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $6,000 · EducationTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOO…TRINITY COLLEGE: $3,500 · EducationTRINITY COLLEGEBERWYN FIRE COMPANY: $6,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPAOLI FIRE COMPANY: $3,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $7,500 · Food & NutritionISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC: $5,000 · HealthKENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2,500 · Human ServicesCANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $1,000 · Human ServicesPAWS FOR LIFE INC: $2,500 · Animals
Other$126,000Education$59,500Public Safety & Disaster$9,000Food & Nutrition$7,500Health$5,000Human Services$3,500Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HENRY FOUNDATION FOR BOTANICAL RESEARCH: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBERWYN FIRE COMPANY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAOLI FIRE COMPANY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHANTICLEER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE HENRY FOUNDATION FOR BOTANICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds BERWYN FIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PAOLI FIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHANTICLEER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chester County Commun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Aetna Foundation IncThe Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Chester County Community FoundationPA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chester County Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mrm Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mrm Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mrm Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home