Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mr October Foundation for Kids

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$197k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$179k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MYouth Development$39kHealth$23kReligion$23kRecreation & Sports$10kPhilanthropy$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $179k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEM 101$178,648
BETHEL B MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
Athletes & Causes Foundation$5,000
St Lucie County Sheriffs Office$1,670
Individual grant recipient$1,040
CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL$762
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%CURING KIDS CANCER INC: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
UT
VA
AZ
NC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
27

Total granted

$1.4M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+2%

Still filing today

29%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE STEM ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $790k · revenue +38% · 27% of their budget
  • S1
    STEM 101
    3× · 2022–2024 · $565k
  • RM
    RED MOUNTAIN ACADEMY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $35k · revenue -59%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION)
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -14%
  • TM
    THE MARCUS ALLEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -52%
  • CE
    CESAR E CHAVEZ ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
2
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
3
Chase the Victory Corporation

Our mission is to strengthen the support of families grieving the loss of a child, fighting childhood cancer, and inspire hope and kindness.

Human Services
4
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
5
Fulphil

Fulphil inspires and enables youth to make a positive impact in the world through education

Human Services
6
Chris Canty Foundation

The Chris Canty Foundation is dedicated to enhancing the total development of youth in our communities. Our goal is to utilize the platform of sports to affect positive change in the lives of children through mentoring, educational…

Youth Development
7
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
8
The Partnership for After School Education Inc

The partnership for after school education is a child-focused organization that promotes and supports quality after school programs, particularly those serving young people from underserved communities. the partnership for after school…

Education
9
Austin Wade Foundation

Children battling cancer

Unclassified
10
Connecting Stem Kids With the Future Inc
—
11
318 Foundation Inc

The 318 foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization focused on empowering black girls and marginalized communities through mentorship, immersive experiences, and sports. our programs focus on leadership development, academic…

Youth Development
12
The Patrick Beauregard Foundation Inc

The patrick beauregard foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to beating colorectal cancer, particularly among young adults under the age of 50.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Marcus Allen Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Red Mountain Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE STEM ACADEMY INC: $790,096 · EducationTHE STEM ACADEMY INCSTEM 101: $565,362 · OtherSTEM 101RED MOUNTAIN ACADEMY INC: $35,000 · Other+26 more: $108,210 · Other+26 moreTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $10,000 · HealthMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $2,562 · HealthTHE MARCUS ALLEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyARETE EDUCATION INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentCuring Kids Cancer Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesEOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $1,010 · Human ServicesCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $5,422 · InternationalPITCCH IN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Education$790,096Other$708,572Health$12,562Philanthropy$10,000Youth Development$8,000Human Services$6,010International$5,422Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE STEM ACADEMY INC: $790,096 over 5y, 27% of budgetRED MOUNTAIN ACADEMY INC: $35,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MARCUS ALLEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetARETE EDUCATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $5,422 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCuring Kids Cancer Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $2,562 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITCCH IN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $1,010 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE STEM ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds RED MOUNTAIN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) ↗
  • Who funds THE MARCUS ALLEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARETE EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds Curing Kids Cancer Inc ↗
  • Who funds Changing Our Perspective Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PITCCH IN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideVA11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mr October Foundation for Kids funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mr October Foundation for Kids. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mr October Foundation for Kids’ filings →

    More from the funding graph