Skip to content
Mount Holly Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mount Holly Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$570kHuman Services$550kHealth$540kInternational$470kCrime & Legal$230kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kHousing & Shelter$40kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $530k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $460k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS$100,000
GRACE ACADEMY INC$100,000
BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100,000
CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC$90,000
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC$70,000
COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC$45,000
CORNELIA CONNELY CENTER FOR EDUCATION$45,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER$30,000
THE FISTULA FOUNDATION$30,000
CAMFED U S A FOUNDATION$30,000
THE WINDWARD SCHOOL$25,000
NEIGHBORS LINK CORP$25,000
CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION A NEW JERSEY NONPROFI$25,000
PROMISE PROJECT INC$25,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $355k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $10k → 17%BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $10k → 17%BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $10k → 17%BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $10k → 17%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $90k → 9%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $60k → 9%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $50k → 9%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $45k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $25k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $10k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $10k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $5k → 9%HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Mount Holly Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mount Holly Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 20 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -22% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
1

Total granted

$2.2M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-22%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue +11%
  • GA
    GRACE ACADEMY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +29%
  • CC
    CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $245k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • VP
    VIOLENCE POLICY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Orphans D/B/a Nph-Usa; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
17/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORNELIA CONNELY CENTER FOR EDUCATION: $150,000 · OtherCORNELIA CONNELY CENTE…PROMISE PROJECT INC: $90,000 · OtherPROMISE PROJECT INCCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $75,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVIC…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $65,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERI…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK: $40,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF …+9 more: $85,000 · Other+9 moreFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $400,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ORPHA…CAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · InternationalCAMFED USA FOUNDATIO…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $245,000 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE COUNCIL …SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMIL…NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $45,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS LINK CORPTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE FUND OF …HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesGRACE ACADEMY: $300,000 · EducationGRACE ACADEMYTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL: $55,000 · EducationTHE WINDWARD SCHOO…BROOKLYN JESUIT PREP: $30,000 · EducationBROOKLYN JESUIT PR…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $15,000 · Education+2 more: $20,000 · EducationBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200,000 · HealthBLYTHEDALE CHILD…FRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $40,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF KAREN…NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · HealthNORTHERN WESTCHE…The Fistula Foundation: $30,000 · HealthThe Fistula Foun…CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthCHRISTOPHER REEV…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…+2 more: $15,000 · HealthEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $205,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN …VIOLENCE POLICY CENTER: $25,000 · Crime & LegalVIOLENCE P…COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC: $105,000 · Recreation & SportsCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$505,000International$460,000Human Services$425,000Education$420,000Health$370,000Crime & Legal$230,000Recreation & Sports$105,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $400,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGRACE ACADEMY: $300,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $245,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $205,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC: $105,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN JESUIT PREP: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVIOLENCE POLICY CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGO DOC GO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPES DOOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jandon FoundationUnited Way of Westche…Viking Global Foundat…Impact100 Westchester…The Thomas and Agnes …Louis and Anne Abrons…Pcsb Community Founda…Morgan Stanley Founda…Ge Aerospace Foundati…National Philanthropi…The Pfizer Foundation…The Ayco Charitable F…
Jandon FoundationNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jandon Foundation · United Way of Westchester and Putnam · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Impact100 Westchester Inc · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Louis and Anne Abrons Foundation Inc · Pcsb Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mount Holly Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mount Holly Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
  • Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services: 37% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mount Holly’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home