Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moss Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$14MEducation$2.3MPhilanthropy$1.6MHealth$1.0MCommunity Improvement$495kCivil Rights$432kYouth Development$250kCrime & Legal$220kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MUSIC CENTER$10,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VISTA DEL MAR: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $5k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $10k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $10k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $10k → 14%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $3k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $3k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $3k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
DC
HI
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 54% of Moss Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 34%.

Moss Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 79 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

79 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 78 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
41

Total granted

$19M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
0%

Still filing today

73%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    California Careforce
    4× · 2017–2020 · $300k · revenue +95%
  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $200k · revenue +4%
  • IC
    Inner City Law Center
    4× · 2017–2020 · $200k · revenue +248%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ANN MOSS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1.5M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • UF
    UCLA FOUNDATION (MENS HEALTH)
    one grant, 2019 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
2
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
3
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
4
Arts for La

Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.

Arts & Culture
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
7
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
8
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ryman-Carroll Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Farrah Fawcett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/83
Grantees still filing
56/83
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MUSIC CENTER: $13,003,396 · OtherTHE MUSIC CENTERUCLA FOUNDATION (MOSS SCHOLARS FUND): $1,661,332 · OtherUCLA FOUNDATION (MOSS SCHOLARS FUND)THE ANN MOSS FOUNDATION: $1,500,000 · OtherTHE ANN MOSS FOUNDATION+76 more: $3,109,920 · Other+76 moreGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $130,000 · Arts & CultureEDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC: $130,000 · Arts & CultureSPIRIT SERIES INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTS: $75,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more: $92,600 · Arts & CultureUCLA FOUNDATION: $321,568 · EducationOAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $75,000 · EducationTREE ACADEMY: $75,000 · EducationCoalition for Engaged Education: $25,000 · EducationEDWIN J GREGSON FOUNDATION: $19,000 · Education+3 more: $12,000 · EducationInner City Law Center: $200,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $65,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $111,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyCONCERN FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyJazz Foundation of America Inc: $16,000 · PhilanthropyVETSAID INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RAINFOREST FUND INC: $75,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentEarth Island Institute Inc: $35,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $22,500 · EnvironmentIntl Society for the Preservation of the Tropical Rainforest: $10,000 · Environment+1 more: $4,500 · EnvironmentLEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS: $162,500 · Community ImprovementBLACK BUSINESS ASSOCIATION OF LA: $27,500 · Community Improvement
Other$19,274,648Arts & Culture$662,600Education$527,568Crime & Legal$265,000Philanthropy$243,000Environment$192,000Community Improvement$190,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $321,568 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Careforce: $300,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $200,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetInner City Law Center: $200,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS: $162,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetPS ARTS: $150,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $130,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC: $130,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $111,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $100,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSPIRIT SERIES INC: $100,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetOAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $75,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE RAINFOREST FUND INC: $75,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTREE ACADEMY: $75,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Eisner Scholars: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of the Night: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTibet Fund Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANGELS AT RISK: $25,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetCoalition for Engaged Education: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOCEANA INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA WINDOW BETWEEN WORLDS: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetEDWIN J GREGSON FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetJazz Foundation of America Inc: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOld Friends Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVETSAID INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds California Careforce ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
  • Who funds Inner City Law Center ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds PS ARTS ↗
  • Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT SERIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds THE RAINFOREST FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TREE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds Young Eisner Scholars ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA33.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The David Geffen Foundation · The Green Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Herb Alpert Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moss Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moss Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Moss Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Moss Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moss’ filings →

More from the funding graph