Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Morris & Rita Kesselman Foundation Trust Co Arthur Kesselman

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$21kHuman Services$14kArts & Culture$12kFood & Nutrition$7kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$3kScience & Tech$2kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$131k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION$1,000
EAGEL HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSE$500
MAYYIM HAYYIM LIVING WATERS$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ORCHARD COVE INC: $135 → 7%INDEPENDENCE HOUSE: $500 → 8%THE KIND KITCHEN OF PALM BEACH: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16k · 7 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
29

Total granted

$16k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+51%

Still filing today

57%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    4× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +9%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON
    2× · 2020–2023 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING PARISH
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • TF
    THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +10%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
9
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
10
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
11
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Westie Rescue of New England Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySupportive Housing Developm…Education Innovation Networ…Animal Rescue and AdoptionYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity Arts Education
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr14%40%35–55yr14%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr14%46%35–55yr14%17%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,330

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
20/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEMPLE ISRAEL INCORPORATED — $6,041 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL INCORPORATEDCHRIST THE KING PARISH — $6,000 · OtherCHRIST THE KING PARISHJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF — $5,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OFJEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S FOUND INC — $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S FOUND INCJEWISH COMMUNICTY CENTER OF — $3,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNICTY CENTER OFTEMPLE BETH SHALOM — $3,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOMAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH HOLO — $3,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH HOLOMEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $2,500 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $2,000 · OtherROFEH INC — $2,000 · OtherTHE HERBERT WERTHEIM UF SCRIPPS — $2,000 · Other+17 more — $8,835 · Other+17 moreThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $3,100 · Arts & CultureQUBIT NEW MUSIC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureINSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureCOTUIT CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $500 · Arts & CultureJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON — $2,800 · Human ServicesKind Kitchen of Palm beach Inc — $2,000 · Human ServicesINDEPENDENCE HOUSE INC — $500 · Human Services+1 more — $135 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP — $5,000 · Food & NutritionCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $1,600 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyHIAS INC — $2,000 · InternationalPLAY FOR PINK INC — $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$48,376Arts & Culture$5,600Human Services$5,435Food & Nutrition$5,000Philanthropy$2,600International$2,000Crime & Legal$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $3,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON — $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKind Kitchen of Palm beach Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIAS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWestie Rescue of New England Inc — $800 over 1y, 22% of budgetCOTUIT CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrchard Cove Inc — $135 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Justin & Genevieve Wyner Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Morris & Rita Kesselman Foundation Trust Co Arthur Kesselman funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 85%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • Independence House Inc85% of income from government
  • Cotuit Center for the Arts Inc1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph