Skip to content

· Private foundation

Morgan Senior Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$301kReligion$18kHealth$13kPublic Benefit$10kEducation$8kAnimals$5kHuman Services$3kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$347k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Art Institute of Chicago$16,000
Lyric Opera of Chicago$10,000
Chicago Symphony Orchestra$10,000
Antiquarian Society of the Art Institute$3,880
Field Museum of Natural History (Women's Board)$2,500
Partners For Progress$1,500
The Frick Collection$1,500
Alliance Franaise de Chicago$1,100
Northwoods Living Care Foundation$1,000
St Chrysostom's Episcopal Church$1,000
Christ Church$1,000
Chicago History Museum$650
NIGHT MINISTRY$500
626 LANDMARK FOUNDATION$200
JP MORGAN LIBRARY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $2k → 8%Partners For Progress: $2k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $250 → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $200 → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $200 → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP: $700 → 8%the night ministry: $500 → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $200 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $200 → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
AZ
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 42 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
19

Total granted

$348k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-11%

Still filing today

60%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LO
    Lyric Opera of Chicago
    8× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +33%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +45%
  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • FM
    FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -7%
  • AF
    American Friends of Christ Church Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -75%
  • TN
    THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
4
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
5
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
6
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
7
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Lincoln Park Conservancy

The mission of the lincoln park conservancy is to preserve and enhance the inspiring beauty of chicago's largest and most visited park for current and future generations. we believe that beauty matters. that it has the transformative power…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Field Museum of Natural History; the most unlike its peers is Lakeview East Community Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lyric Opera of Chicago: $71,000 · Arts & CultureLyric Opera of ChicagoChicago Symphony Orchestra: $44,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony OrchestraTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC: $22,893 · Arts & CultureTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INCTHE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $19,251 · Arts & CultureTHE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY+8 more: $14,089 · Arts & Culture+8 moreFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY (WOMEN'S BOARD): $12,000 · OtherFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HIS…The Frick Collection: $10,110 · OtherThe Frick CollectionST CHRYSOSTOM CHURCH: $10,100 · OtherST CHRYSOSTOM CHURCHTEXTILE SOCIETY OF ART INSTIUTE: $10,100 · OtherTEXTILE SOCIETY OF ART INST…WOMEN'S BOARD OF THE FIELD MUSEUM: $8,200 · OtherWOMEN'S BOARD OF THE FIELD …OLD MASTERS SOCIETY OF THE ART INSTITUTE: $5,500 · OtherOLD MASTERS SOCIETY OF THE …CHRIST CHURCH INC: $5,200 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH INCTHE FIELD MUSEUM WOMEN'S BOARD: $4,700 · OtherCHICAGO HISTORY MUSEUM: $3,935 · OtherALLIANCE FRANCAISE DE CHICAGO: $3,200 · Other+26 more: $16,550 · Other+26 moreTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $67,400 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CH…THE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO: $2,750 · Education+5 more: $4,800 · Education+5 moreJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $9,000 · Public BenefitTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $1,000 · Public BenefitPARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP: $4,600 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2,100 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $6,000 · Environment+2 more: $275 · EnvironmentLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,250 · Animals+1 more: $50 · Animals
Arts & Culture$171,233Other$89,595Education$74,950Public Benefit$10,000Human Services$6,700Environment$6,275Animals$5,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $71,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $67,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $44,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC: $22,893 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $19,251 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $10,110 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP: $4,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATER WIT NFP: $3,700 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $3,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO: $2,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Christ Church Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEBORAH'S PLACE: $1,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budget626 LANDMARK FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $620 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe National Society of the Colonial Dames of America in the State of IL: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $189 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $175 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGENERAL SOCIETY OF MAYFLOWER DESCENDANTS: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMAN'S BOARD OF NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP ↗
  • Who funds THEATER WIT NFP ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds THE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Christ Church Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds 626 LANDMARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Lakeview East Community Partnership ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL16.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morgan Senior Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morgan Senior Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morgan Senior’s filings →

    More from the funding graph