Skip to content
Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition

To improve health care access for all

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$402kHealth$305kCommunity Improvement$199kHuman Services$130kFood & Nutrition$62kHousing & Shelter$49kYouth Development$33kScience & Tech$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $73,855, the rows itemized in this filing. The $82,961 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,106 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
$7,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$891k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY GUIDANCE$19,970
MONTGOMERY FIRST SDA$18,760
LOVE CENTER CHURCH$8,085
MT SINAI MISSIONARY$7,700
LIGHTHOUSE$7,700
HELPING HANDS$6,580
BAPTIST HEALTH CARE$5,060
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $109k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY GUIDANCE: $8k → 9%QUIET STORM OUTREACH: $12k → 18%MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $10k → 18%FRIENDSHIP MISSION: $12k → 18%FAMILY GUIDANCE: $20k → 18%MID-ALABAMA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $12k → 18%FRIENDSHIP MISSION: $13k → 18%KERSHAW YMCA: $9k → 18%KERSHAW YMCA: $7k → 18%CLEVELAND AVENUE YMCA: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$509k · 14 repeat orgs$735k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
48

Total granted

$509k
$669k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+25%

Still filing today

43%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEmploymentYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA IN MONTGOMERY
    3× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +127%
  • FM
    FRIENDSHIP MISSION INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $25k · revenue +37%
  • LM
    LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER
    2× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CA
    Central Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission
    one grant, 2017 · $173k
  • JP
    JT'S PRODUCE
    one grant, 2020 · $27k
  • HI
    HOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
2
Christian Mission Centers Inc

The christian mission centers seeks to meet the mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all people to whom we minister.

—
3
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
4
Northwest Al Mental Health Center

Community mental health center

Health
5
Family Counseling Center of Middle Tennessee Inc

To provide quality, affordable counseling to families and individuals.

Recreation & Sports
6
Mississippi Christian Family Services Inc

To provide rehabilitative social services to the distressed, handicapped and underprivileged.

—
7
Alabama Regional Medical Services

To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers

Health
8
Alabama Affordable Housing Association Inc

To promote the common interest of those involved in the development & management of rural multi-family housing.

Community Improvement
9
Watershed Human and Community Development Agency Inc

Assisting in the growth and development of the College Station community in the areas of employment health care housing and counseling.

Community Improvement
10
Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

Crime & Legal
11
Family Promise of Montgomery County

The organizations mission is to provide lodging, meals, counseling, transportation, and job training services for homeless families living in montgomery county, texas.

Human Services
12
Montgomery County Community Action Development Commission

To provide direct services to the economically disadvantaged and to combat poverty for local residents through various programs such as employment training, rental and utility bills assistance and other community based programs.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Zelda Kitt Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Central Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission: $173,028 · OtherCentral Alabama Regional Planning and Development CommissionMETROPOLITAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $100,027 · OtherMETROPOLITAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHEALTH SERVICES INC: $60,180 · OtherHEALTH SERVICES INCSOUTHEAST RESEARCH INC: $58,482 · OtherSOUTHEAST RESEARCH INCREHEMA HEALTH: $51,694 · OtherREHEMA HEALTH+47 more: $525,252 · Other+47 moreFRIENDSHIP MISSION INC: $25,118 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP…YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $21,640 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS…FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF ALABAMA INC: $19,970 · Human ServicesFAMILY GUI…QUIET STORM OUTREACH GROUP INC: $12,118 · Human ServicesQUIET STOR…MONTGOMERY AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $12,118 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY…MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE & COMMUNITY DEV CORP: $10,404 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY…FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY GUI…MONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC: $7,140 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY…MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA IN MONTGOMERY: $47,834 · HealthMEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $25,800 · HealthMONTGOMERY AREA COMMUNITY WELLNESS COALITION: $7,700 · HealthHOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES INC: $24,236 · EmploymentLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER: $17,753 · ReligionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE RIVER REGION INC: $14,361 · Youth DevelopmentHERITAGE TRAINING AND CAREER CENTER: $13,000 · EducationALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NETWORK: $8,754 · Food & Nutrition
Other$968,663Human Services$116,008Health$81,334Employment$24,236Religion$17,753Youth Development$14,361Education$13,000Food & Nutrition$8,754

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTH SERVICES INC: $60,180 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA IN MONTGOMERY: $47,834 over 3y, 14% of budgetMEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $25,800 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP MISSION INC: $25,118 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES INC: $24,236 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $21,640 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF ALABAMA INC: $19,970 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER: $17,753 over 2y, 16% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE RIVER REGION INC: $14,361 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMONTGOMERY AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $12,118 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMACON RUSSELL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $12,118 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE - NCADD: $10,611 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE & COMMUNITY DEV CORP: $10,404 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY AREA COMMUNITY WELLNESS COALITION: $7,700 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC: $7,140 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHANDSON RIVER REGION: $5,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOUNSELING OUTREACH FOR PREGNANCY EMERGENCY: $5,250 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA IN MONTGOMERY ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE RIVER REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE TRAINING AND CAREER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds QUIET STORM OUTREACH GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds MACON RUSSELL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE - NCADD ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE & COMMUNITY DEV CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundat…River Region United W…Central Alabama Commu…Junior League of Mont…Arthur M Britton Foun…Goodwyn Mills & Cawoo…The Daniel Foundation…Enterprise Holdings F…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Alabama Power Foundation IncAL20.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · River Region United Way · Central Alabama Community Foundation Inc · Junior League of Montgomery Inc · Arthur M Britton Foundation Inc · Goodwyn Mills & Cawood Charitable Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home