Skip to content
Molyneaux Foundation 1045000246 at a glance

· Private foundation

Molyneaux Foundation 1045000246

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$239kYouth Development$182kHealth$147kEducation$80kArts & Culture$28kEmployment$23kHousing & Shelter$15kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k6 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKI PARTNERS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON INC$12,799
THE HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES$7,500
TALAWANDA MIDDLE SCHOOL$5,000
PYRAMID HILL SCULPTURE PARK & MUSEUM$5,000
FITTON CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS$5,000
ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
SAFE HAVEN FARMS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $241k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $16k → 14%TALBERT HOUSE: $10k → 16%THE HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $10k → 14%THE HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $8k → 14%OXFORD SENIORS CITIZENS: $9k → 12%OXFORD SENIORS CITIZENS: $8k → 12%OXFORD SENIORS CITIZENS: $8k → 12%ABILITIES FIRST FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 12%ABILITIES FIRST FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 12%FOCUS ON YOUTH: $8k → 12%FOCUS ON YOUTH: $8k → 12%FOCUS ON YOUTH: $5k → 12%FOCUS ON YOUTH: $3k → 12%FOCUS ON YOUTH: $3k → 12%GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $31k → 12%GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $31k → 12%GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $30k → 12%GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $19k → 12%GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 12%GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $8k → 12%LIFESPAN INC: $6k → 12%GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$702k · 20 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
19

Total granted

$702k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEmploymentHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GM
    GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA
    7× · 2018–2025 · $131k · revenue +63%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON OHIO
    6× · 2018–2026 · $48k · revenue +239%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $34k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • FH
    FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +71%
  • TH
    TALBERT HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +49%
  • OW
    One Way Farm of Fairfield Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fidelity Health Care

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
2
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
3
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

—
4
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
5
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
7
Ohio Living Holdings

See schedule oto provide older adults with caring and quality services toward enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well-being consistent with the christian gospel. the organization is dedicated to living our mission and keeping…

Human Services
8
Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

—
9
Ohio Living Quaker Heights

To provide older adults with caring and quality services toward the enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well being consistent with the christian gospel.

—
10
Miami Valley Hospital Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Health
11
Bowen Health Inc

To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.

Health
12
Friendship Village of Columbus Ohio Inc

To promote independence, wellness and community for older adults in an active and friendly continuing-care environment.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Dayton Inc; the most unlike its peers is Oxford College Corner Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $72,250 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENTIndividual grant recipient: $53,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARACHUTE: $49,576 · OtherPARACHUTEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON OHIO: $47,799 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON OHIOBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $34,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSTALAWANDA MIDDLE SCHOOL: $34,019 · OtherTALAWANDA MIDDLE SCHOOLNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES: $22,500 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICESYWCA: $16,410 · OtherTHE FAMILY RESOURCE CNTR: $15,000 · Other+13 more: $75,215 · Other+13 moreGREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $130,638 · Human ServicesGREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCAHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $33,592 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF DAYTON INCFOCUS ON YOUTH INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesFOCUS ON YOUTH INCOXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $24,500 · Human ServicesOXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INCAbilities First Foundation Inc: $11,147 · Human ServicesTALBERT HOUSE: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesOXFORD COLLEGE CORNER CLINIC: $30,000 · HealthFORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $11,620 · HealthATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS: $5,775 · HealthBEECHWOOD HOME: $5,000 · HealthATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 · HealthSAFE HAVEN FARMS INC: $46,000 · Housing & ShelterFITTON CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $32,500 · Arts & CulturePYRAMID HILL SCULPTURE PARK &MUSEUM: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKI PARTNERS: $20,000 · InternationalINSPIRATION STUDIOS: $10,000 · EmploymentEaster Seals Tristate: $7,500 · Employment
Other$420,269Human Services$240,877Health$67,395Housing & Shelter$46,000Arts & Culture$37,500International$20,000Employment$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $130,638 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON OHIO: $47,799 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetSAFE HAVEN FARMS INC: $46,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $33,592 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFITTON CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $32,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOXFORD COLLEGE CORNER CLINIC: $30,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetFOCUS ON YOUTH INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $24,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $11,620 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAbilities First Foundation Inc: $11,147 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTALBERT HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne Way Farm of Fairfield Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINSPIRATION STUDIOS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFESPAN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS: $5,775 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEECHWOOD HOME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON OHIO ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC ↗
  • Who funds FITTON CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds OXFORD COLLEGE CORNER CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS ON YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKI PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Abilities First Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TALBERT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds One Way Farm of Fairfield Inc ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRATION STUDIOS ↗
  • Who funds ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Easter Seals Tristate ↗
  • Who funds LIFESPAN INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD ↗
  • Who funds BEECHWOOD HOME ↗
  • Who funds PYRAMID HILL SCULPTURE PARK &MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Butler County United …Middletown Community …The Greater Cincinnat…John a Schroth Family…First Financial Found…Sutphin Family Founda…Hatton FoundationHamilton Community Fo…Johnson Charitable Gi…The Richard J Fitton …The Northern Cincinna…Duke Energy Foundation
Butler County United WayOH26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Butler County United Way · Middletown Community Foundation · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · First Financial Foundation · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Hatton Foundation · Hamilton Community Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Richard J Fitton Family Fdn · The Northern Cincinnai Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Molyneaux Foundation 1045000246 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Molyneaux Foundation 1045000246. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Molyneaux Foundation 1045000246’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home