Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mollie Parnis Livingston Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$335k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Community Improvement$653kHealth$341kInternational$272kEducation$249kReligion$220kArts & Culture$211kPhilanthropy$66kYouth Development$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $189k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $102k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$52,251
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$50,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$27,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$25,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$24,000
HAMPTON SYNAGOGUE$20,000
KING SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$15,000
WESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$15,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER$12,500
UJA-FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$10,000
SIXPOINT INC$10,000
KIVUNIM INSTITUTE$10,000
GREENWICH POINT CONSERVANCY INC$7,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REUTH$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIDGE HOUSE INC: $250 → 9%SONGCATCHERS INC: $3k → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $13k → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%DOROT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
OR
IN
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 26 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
36

Total granted

$2.1M
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

62%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $608k · revenue +1%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    7× · 2019–2025 · $295k · revenue +140%
  • WB
    WESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue +205%

Funded once

  • GS
    GA SENIOR FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TA
    THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE (ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND)
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • JA
    JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Greenwich Point Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesVolunteer Fire DepartmentsFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Community Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%8%<5yr13%5%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr17%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr13%1%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%16%20–35yr13%69%35–55yr17%9%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/42
the rest of the field
11%
5,807/53,929

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
23/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Michigan — $295,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganIndividual grant recipient — $180,011 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKING SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND — $120,000 · OtherKING SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INC — $100,000 · OtherWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INCTEMPLE SHIR SHALOM — $57,900 · OtherTEMPLE SHIR SHALOM+40 more — $325,800 · Other+40 moreCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC — $608,000 · Community ImprovementCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK…GREENWICH TOWN PARTY INC — $45,000 · Community ImprovementGREENWICH TOWN PARTY INCFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $105,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF T…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $88,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT I…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER — $25,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRI…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $12,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $10,000 · International+3 more — $10,000 · InternationalWESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $115,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $44,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $4,000 · Arts & CultureGREENWICH ACADEMY INC — $65,000 · EducationGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $35,000 · EducationSIXPOINT INC — $10,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · Education+2 more — $1,000 · EducationPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $27,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyGREENWICH POINT CONSERVANCY INC — $43,500 · Environment
Other$1,078,711Community Improvement$653,000International$250,500Arts & Culture$163,000Education$116,000Philanthropy$53,000Environment$43,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC — $608,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $295,000 over 7y, 21% of budgetWESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $115,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $88,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC — $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH TOWN PARTY INC — $45,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $44,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH POINT CONSERVANCY INC — $43,500 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $28,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER — $25,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER — $22,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIXPOINT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF OFANIM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONGCATCHERS INC — $3,100 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE NEW GROUP INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND BEACH VOLUNTEER SERVICES FOUNDATION INC — $2,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSILVER HILL HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Stamford Hospital — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirls With Impact Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE HOUSE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds WESTHAMPTON BEACH PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds GREENWICH TOWN PARTY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
  • Who funds GREENWICH POINT CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION
  • Who funds SIXPOINT INC
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BIDEAWEE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY23.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Russell Berrie Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · National Philanthropic Trust · Td Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mollie Parnis Livingston Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Bridge House Inc88% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Crisis Center10% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Hospital0% of income from government
  • The Stamford Hospital0% of income from government
  • Silver Hill Hospital Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mollie Parnis Livingston Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mollie Parnis Livingston Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph