Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moffitt-Peelle Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$7kHousing & Shelter$6kEducation$4kArts & Culture$4kFood & Nutrition$3kReligion$2kYouth Development$2kHealth$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$56k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HISTORIC LANDMARKS FOUNDATION OF INDIANA INC$1,000
MOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC$500
Individual grant recipient$500
THE O'CONNOR HOUSE$500
WHEELER MISSION$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF INDIANA$500
CARMEL-CLAY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC$500
QUAKER HAVEN FOUNDATION INC$500
SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC$500
TABERNACLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$250
MID-NORTH FOOD PANTRY INC$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Shepard Community Center: $750 → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC: $500 → 16%HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INC: $500 → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC: $500 → 16%Shepard Community Center: $350 → 16%Shepard Community Center: $300 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21k · 11 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
15

Total granted

$21k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-15%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Shepherd Community Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +176%
  • TO
    THE O'CONNOR HOUSE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +47%
  • MH
    MOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue -26%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WARM PLACE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—
2
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

—
3
Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc

Indianapolis Interfaith Hospitality Network leverages the resources of houses of worship in the greater Indianapolis area to provide emergency shelter, food, case management, and aftercare services to families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
4
Habitat for Humanity Clark & Floyd Indiana Inc

The construction and renovation of homes for low income families.

—
5
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
6
Perry County in Habitat for Humanity Inc

Build or rehabilitate homes for low income families to purchase at cost on interest free mortgages

—
7
Lifetime Housing Group Inc

Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.

Food & Nutrition
8
Orange Co in Habitat for Humanity Inc

Hfh is a christian non-profit organization working towards the elimination of poverty by making decent shelter available. orange county, indiana hfh provides residential housing for low income families who have been residents of orange…

—
9
Meals On Wheels Inc

Meals on wheels is the leading privately funded organization promoting dignity and independent living for the homebound, through volunteer delivery of nutritious meals in the greater indianapolis area.

Food & Nutrition
10
Hoosier Hills Food Bank Inc

Hoosier hills food bank collects, stores, and distributes nutritious food products to non-profit organizations, which provide free feeding programs that serve both ill and needy families and individuals in monroe, martin, owen, orange,…

Food & Nutrition
11
Harvest Homes Inc

To provide affordable housing under a grant from the u.s. department of agriculture

Housing & Shelter
12
Habitat for Humanity of Warrick County

Habitat for humanity of warrick county, inc. is a not-for-profit christian housing ministry that strives to elimate substandard housing by building in partnership with god and his people, decent, affordable homes in which people in warrick…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hamilton County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WARM PLACE: $2,000 · OtherTHE WARM PLACEINDIANAPOLIS FIRST FRIENDS MEETING: $1,700 · OtherINDIANAPOLIS FIRST FRIENDS MEETINGIndividual grant recipient: $1,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,600 · OtherHAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYFIRST FRIENDS OVERMAN SCHOLARS: $1,500 · OtherFIRST FRIENDS OVERMAN SCHOLARSIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $1,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN CHURCHCHRISTIAN HEALTHCARE: $750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $750 · OtherQUAKER HAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $750 · Other+11 more: $3,522 · Other+11 moreShepherd Community Inc: $3,900 · Human ServicesShepherd Community IncTHE O'CONNOR HOUSE: $3,750 · Human ServicesTHE O'CONNOR HOUSEHEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INC: $500 · Human ServicesHEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INCWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $500 · Human ServicesWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesMOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC: $2,800 · Food & NutritionMOTHER HUBB…MID-NORTH FOOD PANTRY INC: $250 · Food & NutritionMID-NORTH F…Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $2,000 · Arts & CulturePARTNERS IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $500 · Housing & ShelterGood Samaritan Network of Hamilton County Inc: $250 · Philanthropy
Other$16,772Human Services$8,850Food & Nutrition$3,050Arts & Culture$2,000Housing & Shelter$500Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetShepherd Community Inc: $3,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE O'CONNOR HOUSE: $3,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC: $2,800 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetQUAKER HAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF INDIANA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Samaritan Network of Hamilton County Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Shepherd Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE O'CONNOR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds QUAKER HAVEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARMEL-CLAY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MID-NORTH FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Good Samaritan Network of Hamilton County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Quaker Voluntary Service Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moffitt-Peelle Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moffitt-Peelle Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moffitt-Peelle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph