Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mjc Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$949kEducation$162kYouth Development$152kHealth$105kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kPublic Benefit$15kRecreation & Sports$13kAnimals$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$197
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL OPERATION CARE FUND INC$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ALLAN HANCOCK COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $806k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $305k → 13%SPECIAL OPERTIONS CARE FUND INC: $209k → 13%NATHAN ADELSON HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%SPECIAL OPERTIONS CARE FUND INC: $179k → 13%SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $100k → 13%SPECIAL OPERATION CARE FUND INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MI
NY
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
KY
TN
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 18 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
29

Total granted

$1.3M
$254k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+29%

Still filing today

28%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $803k · revenue +175%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +29%
  • AH
    ALLAN HANCOCK COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • JS
    JENIFER STRAIT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $82k
  • TS
    THE STATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +119%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Operators Transition Foundation Inc

The special operators transition foundation ("sotf") assists special operation forces veterans transition from the military into their next successful career.

Public Benefit
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
American College of Surgeons

The american college of surgeons is dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safeguarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment.

Education
6
American College of Vet Radiology

The american college of veterinary radiology (acvr) is a member-driven, not-for-profit organization consisting of over 800 accredited veterinary radiologists and radiation oncologists. the college was founded in 1961 by veterinarians…

—
7
National Association of Veterans' Research and Education Foundations

Navref's mission is to advance the success of the va-affiliated nonprofit research and education corporations.

Arts & Culture
8
Animal Cancer Foundation

Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…

Health
9
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
10
Nevada Cancer Coalition

Nevada cancer coalition works to reduce the burden of cancer in nevada by fostering statewide collaboration, empowering people with information and connections, and advocating for equitable access to care.

Health
11
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
12
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bergenfield Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $803,290 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesSOC - F: $155,751 · OtherSOC - FJENIFER STRAIT FOUNDATION: $82,000 · OtherJENIFER STRAIT FOUNDATIONPahranagat Valley Fire District: $60,462 · OtherPahranagat Valley Fire DistrictPahranagat Valley High School: $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherSOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $23,338 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $22,250 · OtherLUND SCHOOL: $22,000 · Other+28 more: $128,086 · Other+28 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentCLARK COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOC: $3,341 · Youth DevelopmentTHE STATION FOUNDATION: $50,019 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 · HealthALLIANCE FOR CHILDHOOD DISEASES: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthDixie Technical College: $15,000 · EducationGLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public BenefitBergenfield Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Human Services$806,290Other$546,387Youth Development$73,341Health$56,019Education$15,000Public Benefit$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $803,290 over 5y, 19% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE STATION FOUNDATION: $50,019 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetGLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBergenfield Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetALLAN HANCOCK COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $5,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetELY ROTARY CLUB INC: $5,120 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCLARK COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOC: $3,341 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDHOOD DISEASES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORECLOSED UPON PETS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSECRETARIAT CENTER INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYNE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTENNESSEE BREAST CANCER COALITION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dixie Technical College ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bergenfield Volunteer Fire Department Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALLAN HANCOCK COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ELY ROTARY CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds Nathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDHOOD DISEASES ↗
  • Who funds FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mjc Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mjc Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mjc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph