Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Nevada · Nonprofit

FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC

FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC (Nevada) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $29,894 to it, the largest being PETSMART CHARITIES INC ($24,395). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$139k
Revenue FY2024
4
Funders on record
$30k
Grants received
$145k
Net assets
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 9%

Against its field

FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC is better cushioned than half of the 6,424 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · below the median
Months of reserve13.1mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,424 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($87k) Expenses 100 ($87k) Net assets 100 ($66k)2018 Revenue 142 ($124k) Expenses 97 ($85k) Net assets 160 ($106k)2019 Revenue 190 ($166k) Expenses 107 ($93k) Net assets 270 ($178k)2020 Revenue 129 ($113k) Expenses 130 ($114k) Net assets 268 ($178k)2021 Revenue 140 ($122k) Expenses 135 ($118k) Net assets 275 ($182k)2022 Revenue 139 ($122k) Expenses 162 ($142k) Net assets 245 ($162k)2023 Revenue 156 ($137k) Expenses 132 ($116k) Net assets 211 ($139k)2024 Revenue 159 ($139k) Expenses 152 ($133k) Net assets 220 ($145k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (159)Expenses (152)Net assets (220)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

32% of FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,013 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$2
17
$39k
18
$73k
19
$877
20
$4k
21
$20k
22
$21k
23
$6k
24
13
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income fell $7k → $4k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
$24k
funders
1
1
1
1
1
2
3

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 82% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC.

82%
largest funder
95%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 91% · 2023 52%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC draws 93% of its grant income from funders outside Nevada, across 3 states in all.

WA
NV
AZ

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
22
23
Nevada out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nevada

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC?
FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC (Nevada) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $29,894 to it, the largest being PETSMART CHARITIES INC ($24,395). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $29,894 in grants to FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC?
PETSMART CHARITIES INC is the largest funder on record, with $24,395 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FORECLOSED UPON PETS INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nevada. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing