Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mitchell P and Karen J Kopin Family Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$179k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$475kReligion$291kEducation$74kInternational$17kHealth$6kHuman Services$5kRecreation & Sports$5kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$510
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA$110,180
NORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH EL$36,760
ALBERT EINSTEIN ACADEMY$11,180
THE SIXTH11 PROJECT$10,000
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$5,000
JCFS CHICAGO HONORING JUDY SMITH$2,500
Individual grant recipient$750
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE$680
PBC FOOD BANK$510
RIDE 4 ROW$180
IL HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$180
NO SHAME ON U$150
Individual grant recipient$100
IMPACT 100$100
GUEST HOUSE CHICAGO$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LA'ARETZ: $3k → 20%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
WI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DE
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$842k · 15 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
31

Total granted

$842k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+23%

Still filing today

47%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $325k · revenue +13%
  • AE
    ALBERT EINSTEIN ACADEMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $57k · revenue +93%
  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • L
    LA-ARETZ
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • EXPERIENCE CAMPSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +119%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
3
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
4
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Oshman Family Jewish Community Center

To enrich lives, build community, and inspire jewish journeys.

—
8
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
9
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
12
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Wellness Center; the most unlike its peers is RUN2REVIVE. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH EL: $267,329 · OtherNORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH ELJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $131,360 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH FLORIDAJEWISH FEDERATION: $17,900 · Other+35 more: $55,744 · Other+35 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $325,360 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO+2 more: $1,853 · PhilanthropyALBERT EINSTEIN ACADEMY: $57,360 · Education+2 more: $430 · EducationCentral Fund of Israel: $10,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,480 · InternationalAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,800 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1,100 · HealthRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,000 · HealthRUN2REVIVE: $500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 · HealthWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $250 · HealthCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $180 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $180 · HealthLA-ARETZ: $2,500 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1,000 · Human ServicesEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $250 · Youth Development
Other$472,333Philanthropy$327,213Education$57,790International$12,480Health$5,310Human Services$3,500Youth Development$2,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $325,360 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALBERT EINSTEIN ACADEMY: $57,360 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA-ARETZ: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,480 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUN2REVIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNO SHAME ON U INC: $330 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE HANNA INC: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIDA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Kesher: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ALBERT EINSTEIN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds LA-ARETZ ↗
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds RUN2REVIVE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEAP INC ↗
  • Who funds NO SHAME ON U INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mitchell P and Karen J Kopin Family Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mitchell P and Karen J Kopin Family Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Albert Einstein Academy: 1% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mitchell P and Karen J Kopin Family Fdn?

Find your warmest path to Mitchell P and Karen J Kopin Family Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mitchell P and Karen J Kopin Family Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph