Skip to content

· Public charity

Missouri Family Health Council Inc

We exist to ensure that everyone - no matter their income, geography, identity, or circumstances - can access high-quality sexual and reproductive healthcare.

$8.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$41MHuman Services$3.8MCommunity Improvement$196kReligion$169kYouth Development$50k
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $927k
  • $250k+11 grants · $7.6M
$375,471
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOODGREAT PLAINS$2,315,464
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS$1,283,010
OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORP$607,870
THE CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL$482,848
ST LOUIS COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH$451,623
FAMILY CARE HEALTH CENTERS$430,853
STODDARD COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH CENTE$418,046
JEFFERSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$411,409
EAST MO ACTION AGENCY$410,253
CONTRACEPTIVE CHOICE CENTER$401,151
BUTLER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$375,471
SOCIAL WELFARE BOARD$247,206
UCM$168,620
TCHD$113,300
SPECTRUM HEALTH CARE$77,599
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $4.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORP: $608k → 15%GREEN HILLS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $185k → 18%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORP: $436k → 15%GREEN HILLS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $178k → 18%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORP: $425k → 15%GREEN HILLS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $176k → 18%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORP: $389k → 15%GREEN HILLS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $159k → 18%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORP: $388k → 15%GREEN HILLS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $158k → 18%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORP: $381k → 15%GREEN HILLS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $104k → 18%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORP: $376k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45M · 26 repeat orgs$691k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
6

Total granted

$45M
$309k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+8%

Still filing today

62%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $382k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8.7M · revenue +105%
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri
    7× · 2019–2025 · $6.8M · revenue +5%
  • OA
    Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • TW
    Trust Women Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $131k · revenue 0%
  • OT
    OZARK TRI-COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUMgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $99k · revenue +108%
  • Morton Comprehensive Health Services Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern Iowa Health Center

Eastern Iowa Health Center provides accessible, high-quality healthcare services to those in need in the Linn County, Iowa area. Our services include family medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, labor and delivery, behavioral…

Health
2
Owensville Primary Care Inc

Our mission is to provide patient centered medical and behavioral health services to our community. As a nonprofit organization, we provide these services to all persons, including our communitys most vulnerable - regardless of financial…

Health
3
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
4
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
5
Northeast Missouri Health Council Inc

The ne mo health council, inc. was established to meet the primary healthcare needs of the residents of ne mo through a not-for-profit community-responsible approach. see schedule o for details.

—
6
Partnership Health Center Inc

Partnership health center ensures that accessible, comprehensive primary healthcare is provided to the medically underserved population in our region, through a partnership of community resources.

—
7
Affinia Healthcare

To provide high quality health care and exceptional service, while promoting healthy lifestyles.

—
8
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
9
Northland Health Care Access

Operating an integrated community health system providing access to health care for the uninsured low income residents of three counties in Missouri

Health
10
Missouri Family Health Council Inc

We exist to ensure that everyone - no matter their income, geography, identity, or circumstances - can access high-quality sexual and reproductive healthcare.

Health
11
Midtown Health Center

Provide high quality medical, behavioral health, and dental services that are affordable, accessible, and patient-focused.

Health
12
Progressive Community Health Centers Inc

Progressive Community Health Centers exists to improve the health and quality of life of the community by providing culturally competent services that addresses identified needs.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Regional Health Care Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Washington University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $8,692,182 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINSPlanned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri: $6,784,093 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Great Rivers-MissouriFamily Care Health Centers: $2,158,215 · HealthFamily Care Health CentersThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $2,002,644 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Hospital+9 more: $1,760,604 · Health+9 moreJEFFERSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $2,434,441 · OtherJEFFERSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTSTODDARD COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH CENTE: $2,429,186 · OtherSTODDARD COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH CENTEST LOUIS COUNTY PARKS: $2,156,088 · OtherST LOUIS COUNTY PARKSBUTLER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $1,839,352 · OtherBUTLER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTSocial Welfare Board: $1,674,521 · OtherSocial Welfare BoardTri-Rivers Family Planning Inc: $1,619,466 · OtherTri-Rivers Family Planning IncNORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES: $1,209,969 · OtherNORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATIO…BOONE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $678,869 · Other+11 more: $1,345,371 · Other+11 moreOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $3,001,898 · Human ServicesOzarks Ar…GREEN HILLS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $960,179 · Human ServicesGREEN HIL…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2,542,108 · EducationEAST MISSOURI ACTION AGENCY INC: $2,237,137 · Community ImprovementOZARK TRI-COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM: $98,501 · Housing & Shelter
Health$21,397,738Other$15,387,263Human Services$3,962,077Education$2,542,108Community Improvement$2,237,137Housing & Shelter$98,501

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $8,692,182 over 7y, 12% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri: $6,784,093 over 7y, 11% of budgetOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $3,001,898 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2,542,108 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEAST MISSOURI ACTION AGENCY INC: $2,237,137 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetFamily Care Health Centers: $2,158,215 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $2,002,644 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTri-Rivers Family Planning Inc: $1,619,466 over 5y, 63% of budgetNORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES: $1,209,969 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetGREEN HILLS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $960,179 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetFORDLAND CLINIC INC: $490,348 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSpectrum Health Care: $345,033 over 5y, 25% of budgetBETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS: $322,038 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetREGIONAL HEALTH CARE CLINIC INC: $246,136 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBIG SPRINGS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $234,132 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC: $166,260 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $130,789 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetOZARK TRI-COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM: $98,501 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMorton Comprehensive Health Services Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVariety Care Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEconomic Security Corporation of Southwest Area: $19,806 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri ↗
  • Who funds Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EAST MISSOURI ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Care Health Centers ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Tri-Rivers Family Planning Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES ↗
  • Who funds GREEN HILLS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds FORDLAND CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Spectrum Health Care ↗
  • Who funds BETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG SPRINGS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PLANNING CLINIC OF FRANKLIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Trust Women Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OZARK TRI-COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds Morton Comprehensive Health Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Variety Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds Economic Security Corporation of Southwest Area ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA24.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Heart to Heart International Inc · Delta Dental of Missouri · Americares Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Missouri Family Health Council Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Missouri Family Health Council Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Morton Comprehensive Health Services Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Northeastern Oklahoma Community Health Centers Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Variety Care Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Missouri Family Health Council Inc?

Find your warmest path to Missouri Family Health Council Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Missouri Family Health Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph