Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Mississippi Delta National Heritage Area Partnership Inc

The primary charitable and educational mission of the organization is to conserve, interpret, and promote the heritage area and, by so doing, to achieve historical understanding, preserve historically significant places, structures, and objects, encourage economic development and further the education and general welfare of the people of…

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$238kHuman Services$173kCommunity Improvement$42kHealth$39kEducation$16kAnimals$14kRecreation & Sports$12kPhilanthropy$12kOther$289k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $97,846 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $151,422 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $53,576 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$13,846
Median grant
2
States reached
$920k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BB KING MUSEUM AND DELTA INTER CTR$16,000
CLEVELAND MUSIC FOUNDATION INC$16,000
COAHOMA COLLECTIVE$16,000
DELTA BLUES FOUNDATION INC$13,846
FRIENDS OF LEXINGTON PRESERVATION$12,000
FREEDOM PROJECT NETWORK$12,000
LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER FOUNDATION$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 32%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 24%GREENVILLE RENAISSANCE SCHOLARS: $14k → 27%TUWILER COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER: $17k → 31%WE2GETHER CREATING CHANGE: $24k → 32%COAHOMA COLLECTIVE: $24k → 36%MS STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 24%TUWILER COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER: $7k → 31%WE2GETHER CREATING CHANGE: $6k → 32%COAHOMA COLLECTIVE: $22k → 36%COAHOMA COLLECTIVE: $16k → 36%COAHOMA COLLECTIVE: $14k → 36%COAHOMA COLLECTIVE: $6k → 36%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Mississippi Delta National Heritage Area Partnership Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in MS; read by stated purpose it is 89% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Mississippi Delta National Heritage Area Partnership Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$630k · 13 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$630k
$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+86%

Still filing today

69%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CLEVELAND MUSIC FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $103k · revenue +71%
  • CC
    COAHOMA COLLECTIVE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $82k · revenue +56% · 46% of their budget
  • BB
    B B KING MUSEUM AND DELTA INTERPRETIVE CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +212%
  • MB
    MOUND BAYOU CIVIC CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • BO
    B&GC of MS Band of Choctaw Indians
    one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Revitalize Mississippi Inc
Community Improvement
2
East Mississippi Development Corporation Meridian Community College
3
Museum of the Mississippi Delta

The museum of the mississippi delta, founded in 1969, is at the crossroads of delta history and art. our extensive collection includes artifacts related to agriculture, native america, regional military history and one of the delta's most…

Arts & Culture
4
Crossroads Cultural Arts Center

The purpose of the Crossroads Cultural Art Center (CCAC) is to support residents of Mississippi Delta in preserving and sharing the history and culture of the Delta amongst themselves and with visitors, especially through the arts. The…

Arts & Culture
5
Our Mississippi Foundation
Community Improvement
6
Clarksdale Revitalization Inc

The primary objective and purpose of this organization is to oversee the implementation of the physical and economic revitalization of downtown Clarksdale, MS.

7
Delta Council

Improvement of the business conditions of agriculture and trade in the mississippi delta communities and in industrial development in the mississippi delta

8
Mississippis Lower Delta Partnership

Contribute to local charitable organizations, educate populace regarding local history and wildlife issues, promote conservation of wildlife, nature, and historical sites

Environment
9
Canton Madison Historical Society

Preserve the history of the city of canton and madison county ms

Arts & Culture
10
Midtown Development Corporation

To promote the economic development, cultural activities, recreational choices, and historical integrity of Midtown Memphis.

Community Improvement
11
Delta Center Stage Inc

Delta center stage, inc. provides educational and cultural opportunities for the mississippi delta area through the presentation of amateur live theater.

12
Mississippi Art Colony Inc

To provide camps and to promote art

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Heritage Trust and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Lexington Preservation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr17%46%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr18%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%16%5–10yr17%38%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr18%14%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
16%
242/1,513

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY — $85,212 · OtherMISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYDELTA BLUES FOUNDATION INC — $53,335 · OtherDELTA BLUES FOUNDATION INCMT ZION MEMORIAL FUND FOR BLUES MUSIC AND JUSTICE — $29,500 · OtherMT ZION MEMORIAL FUND FOR BLUES MUSIC AND …QUITMAN COUTY BOARD OF SUPERV — $23,000 · OtherQUITMAN COUTY BOARD OF SUPERVCLEVELAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $19,600 · OtherCLEVELAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCEMOUND BAYOU CIVIC CLUB — $19,600 · OtherMOUND BAYOU CIVIC CLUBB&GC of MS Band of Choctaw Indians — $19,600 · OtherB&GC of MS Band of Choctaw IndiansBB KING MUSEUM AND DELTA INTERPRE — $19,541 · OtherBB KING MUSEUM AND DELTA INTERPREFAMILY AND YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES — $19,200 · OtherFAMILY AND YOUTH OPPORTUNITIESLower Mississippi River Foundation — $12,000 · OtherFREEDOM PROJECT NETWORK — $12,000 · OtherCLEVELAND MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $103,005 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSIC FOUNDATION INCB B KING MUSEUM AND DELTA INTERPRETIVE CENTER — $60,000 · Arts & CultureB B KING MUSEUM AND DELTA INTERP…MISSISSIPPI HERITAGE TRUST — $48,500 · Arts & CultureMISSISSIPPI HERITAGE TRUSTFrom The Heart Productions — $18,144 · Arts & CultureFrom The Heart ProductionsDELTA ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $8,755 · Arts & CultureCOAHOMA COLLECTIVE — $81,500 · Human ServicesCOAHOMA COLLECTIVEWe2gether Creating Change — $29,500 · Human ServicesWe2gether Creating Chan…Mississippi State University Foundation Inc — $24,500 · Human ServicesMississippi State Unive…Tutwiler Community Education Center — $23,710 · Human ServicesTutwiler Community Educ…GREENVILLE RENAISSANCE SCHOLARS — $13,790 · Human ServicesGREENVILLE RENAISSANCE …Cleveland Development Foundation Inc — $29,500 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF LEXINGTON PRESERVATION INC — $12,000 · Community ImprovementSHAPE UP MISSISSIPPI — $38,860 · HealthALEX FOUNDATION — $15,762 · EducationDELTA WIND BIRDS — $13,600 · Animals
Other$312,588Arts & Culture$238,404Human Services$173,000Community Improvement$41,500Health$38,860Education$15,762Animals$13,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLEVELAND MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $103,005 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCOAHOMA COLLECTIVE — $81,500 over 5y, 46% of budgetB B KING MUSEUM AND DELTA INTERPRETIVE CENTER — $60,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMISSISSIPPI HERITAGE TRUST — $48,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetSHAPE UP MISSISSIPPI — $38,860 over 2y, 31% of budgetCleveland Development Foundation Inc — $29,500 over 2y, 23% of budgetWe2gether Creating Change — $29,500 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetMississippi State University Foundation Inc — $24,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTutwiler Community Education Center — $23,710 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCLEVELAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $19,600 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions — $18,144 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALEX FOUNDATION — $15,762 over 1y, 14% of budgetGREENVILLE RENAISSANCE SCHOLARS — $13,790 over 1y, 19% of budgetDELTA WIND BIRDS — $13,600 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF LEXINGTON PRESERVATION INC — $12,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetDELTA ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $8,755 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northwest MississippiMS21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northwest Mississippi · Mississippi Humanities Council Inc · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mississippi Delta National Heritage Area Partnership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph