Skip to content
Mirnahill Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mirnahill Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
122
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.8MYouth Development$652kReligion$634kEducation$430kFood & Nutrition$283kArts & Culture$281kInternational$236kScience & Tech$201kOther$0
02FY2024 · 122 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k86 grants · $261k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $551k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
$5,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAPAL FOUNDATION$100,000
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC & PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION$75,200
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$50,000
SV2$40,000
PEACE PLAYERS$30,000
PLAYWORKS$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FRANCISCO$25,000
ACT$25,000
POSITIVE COACHNG ALLIANCE$25,000
RIGHT TO PLAY$25,000
GRASS ROOT SOCCER INC$25,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF SILICON VALLEY$20,000
AMERICA SCORES$16,500
UP 2 US$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%GALLOPNYC: $1k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $1k → 14%SOLES4SOULS: $15k → 14%DOLLAR FOR: $1k → 9%ROOTS AND WINGS: $1k → 4%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $1k → 14%SOLES4SOULS: $10k → 14%DOLLAR FOR: $1k → 9%ROOTS AND WINGS: $1k → 4%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $1k → 14%SOLES4SOULS: $5k → 14%DOLLAR FOR: $1k → 9%ROOTS AND WINGS: $1k → 4%SOLES4SOULS: $5k → 14%ROOTS AND WINGS: $1k → 4%PATH: $5k → 11%SOLES4SOULS: $5k → 14%ROOTS AND WINGS: $1k → 4%SOLES4SOULS: $5k → 14%ROOTS AND WINGS: $1k → 4%ROOTS AND WINGS: $1k → 4%BENEFECIENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $5k → 8%BENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $5k → 8%BENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 152 repeat orgs$470k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

152 repeat relationships: 105 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

152
49

Total granted

$4.5M
$424k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+3%

Still filing today

62%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $265k · revenue +138%
  • US
    UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $201k · revenue +32%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO
    7× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - WOMEN'S RESIDENCE HALL
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
  • AC
    ABUSE COUNSELING & TREATMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +50%
  • AF
    ACT - FY19 TRUSTEE MEMBERSHIP
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
5
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
6
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
7
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
8
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
9
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
10
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
11
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Michelle Akers Sundance Horse Rescue and Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

137 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 137 of the 219 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
133/137
Grantees still filing
93/137
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE PAPAL FOUNDATION: $508,999 · OtherTHE PAPAL FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - WOMEN'S RESIDENCE HALL: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - WOMEN'S RESIDENCE HALLACT: $151,909 · OtherACTSV2: $141,015 · OtherSV2+135 more: $1,591,513 · Other+135 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $810,315 · EducationUniversity of Notre D…POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE: $100,000 · EducationPOSITIVE COACHING ALL…REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS: $70,000 · EducationREAL OPTIONS FOR CITY…RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $41,000 · Education+9 more: $63,322 · Education+9 moreUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $200,685 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES OLY…GRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $125,000 · Recreation & SportsGRASSROOT SOCCER …SPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC: $95,000 · Recreation & SportsSPORTS HUMANITARI…EAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING: $70,500 · Recreation & SportsEAST PALO ALTO TE…Bay Area Womens Sports Initiative: $70,000 · Recreation & SportsBay Area Womens S…UP2US INC: $70,000 · Recreation & SportsUP2US INCBAY AREA SCORES: $69,000 · Recreation & SportsBAY AREA SCORESGirls on the Run of the Bay Area Inc: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsGirls on the Run …CENTER FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE THROUGH SPORT: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTER FOR HEALIN…+7 more: $79,250 · Recreation & Sports+7 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $130,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEACEPLAYERS…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentPLAYWORKS ED…Ultimate Impact Inc: $42,500 · Youth DevelopmentUltimate Imp…THE FIT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Youth Development+5 more: $65,000 · Youth Development+5 moreSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $264,917 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $60,000 · Human ServicesSOLES4SOULS INC: $45,400 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 · Human ServicesBENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION: $7,440 · Human Services+5 more: $16,000 · Human ServicesTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL: $83,350 · PhilanthropyEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community Foundation: $15,000 · PhilanthropyGATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS: $10,000 · PhilanthropySILICON VALLEY SOCIAL VENTURE FUND - SV2: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $9,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Philanthropy+2 more: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,593,436Education$1,084,637Recreation & Sports$889,435Youth Development$617,500Food & Nutrition$274,917Human Services$183,840Philanthropy$162,850

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $810,315 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $264,917 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $200,685 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $130,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $125,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $125,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $125,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE: $100,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC: $95,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL: $83,350 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING: $70,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetREAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS: $70,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBay Area Womens Sports Initiative: $70,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetUP2US INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBAY AREA SCORES: $69,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $61,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGirls on the Run of the Bay Area Inc: $60,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE THROUGH SPORT: $50,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA): $50,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS IN THE GAME NFP: $50,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetABUSE COUNSELING & TREATMENT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSOLES4SOULS INC: $45,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUltimate Impact Inc: $42,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCURIODYSSEY: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $20,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOakland Soccer Club: $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGRASSROOTS HEALTH: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX BIKES: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCOACHING CORPS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS ENJOY EXERCISE NOW: $20,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC: $19,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOBTRAIN INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLACROSSE THE BAY: $15,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetBENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOT SOCCER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds EAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING ↗
  • Who funds REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds Bay Area Womens Sports Initiative ↗
  • Who funds UP2US INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA SCORES ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds Girls on the Run of the Bay Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE THROUGH SPORT ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA) ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS IN THE GAME NFP ↗
  • Who funds ABUSE COUNSELING & TREATMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLES4SOULS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ultimate Impact Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The David and Lucile …Jewish Community Fede…The San Francisco Fou…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Bright Funds Foundati…Gordon E and Betty I …Atkinson FoundationLos Altos Mountain Vi…Bothin FoundationOlympic Club Foundati…The Goldman Sachs Cha…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA37.1× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Bright Funds Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Olympic Club Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mirnahill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mirnahill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • New World Symphony Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mirnahill Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mirnahill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 219 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mirnahill’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home