Skip to content
Minnesota Association of Community Health Centers at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Minnesota Association of Community Health Centers

Enhance minnesota primary health care; increase the efficiency, viability, and strength of minnesota primary health care facilities

$411k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$8.3M
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $271k
$39,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER$86,550
COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE$75,527
SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC$55,468
SCENIC RIVERS (COOK AREA)$52,956
UNITED FAMILY MEDICINE$39,200
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SOURCE$37,400
COMMUNITY UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE CENTER$24,900
NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC$21,400
PEOPLE'S HEALTH CNTR CRPC$8,900
SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC$8,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE: $76k → 11%COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $70k → 11%UNITED FAMILY MEDICINE: $216k → 14%LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $135k → 15%OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER: $177k → 15%SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC: $83k → 9%COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE: $34k → 11%COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $54k → 11%UNITED FAMILY MEDICINE: $212k → 14%LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $111k → 15%OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER: $87k → 15%SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC: $57k → 9%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DBA COMMUNITY-UNIVESITY HEALTH CARE: $342k → 11%UNITED FAMILY MEDICINE: $39k → 14%LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $59k → 15%OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER: $58k → 15%NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $247k → 11%SCENIC RIVERS HEALTH SERVICES: $287k → 15%OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER: $47k → 15%NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $98k → 11%MINNESOTA COMMUNITY CARE: $1.0M → 14%SCENIC RIVERS HEALTH SERVICES: $240k → 15%OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER: $26k → 15%NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $49k → 11%MINNESOTA COMMUNITY CARE: $667k → 14%SCENIC RIVERS (COOK AREA): $53k → 15%COMMUNITY UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE CENTER: $28k → 11%MINNESOTA COMMUNITY CARE: $208k → 14%SCENIC RIVERS: $50k → 15%COMMUNITY UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE CENTER: $25k → 11%OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER: $188k → 14%NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $21k → 11%OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER: $148k → 14%SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $278k → 11%SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $184k → 11%SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $127k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE: $394k → 11%SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $55k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE: $142k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SOURCE: $37k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE: $102k → 11%NORTHPOINT HEALTH AND WELLNESS: $356k → 11%NORTHPOINT HEALTH AND WELLNESS: $261k → 11%CEDAR RIVERSIDE PEOPLE'S CENTER DBA PEOPLE'S CENTER CLINICS AND SERVICES: $191k → 11%CEDAR RIVERSIDE PEOPLE'S CENTER DBA PEOPLE'S CENTER CLINICS AND SERVICES: $68k → 11%UNIVERSAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC DBA AXIS MEDICAL CENTER: $554k → 11%AXIS MEDICAL CENTER: $174k → 11%AXIS MEDICAL CENTER: $27k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 15 repeat orgs$352k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$8.0M
$352k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+107%

Still filing today

93%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WEST SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +4%
  • UM
    Universal Medical Services INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $754k · revenue +13%
  • SC
    SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $665k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2022 · $342k
  • IH
    INDIAN HEALTH BOARD OF MINNEAPOLIS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +107%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
2
Northland Health Partners Community Health Center

Northland community health center is committed to providing access to affordable and quality health services.

Health
3
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
4
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
5
Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health
6
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
7
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
8
Midtown Health Center

Provide high quality medical, behavioral health, and dental services that are affordable, accessible, and patient-focused.

Health
9
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
10
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
11
Coal Country Community Health Center

Working together as partners to enhance the lives of area residents by providing a neighborhood of patient centered healthcare services that promote wellness, prevention and care coordination.

Health
12
Capitol City Family Health Center Inc

To provide quality, affordable health care to all.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Family Practice Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Universal Medical Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,896,764 · HealthWEST SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INCUniversal Medical Services INC: $754,496 · HealthUniversal Medical Services INCSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $665,218 · HealthSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INCCOOK AREA HEALTH SERVICES INC: $651,356 · HealthCOOK AREA HEALTH SERVICES INCNorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc: $617,262 · HealthNorthPoint Health and Wellness Center IncUNITED FAMILY PRACTICE HEALTH CENTER: $480,557 · HealthUNITED FAMILY PRACTICE HEALTH CENTERNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $437,143 · HealthNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINICOPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER: $394,029 · HealthOPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTEROPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC: $355,560 · HealthLAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $304,969 · HealthCEDAR RIVERSIDE PEOPLE'S CENTER: $267,921 · Health+2 more: $168,572 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE: $681,741 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD HEAL…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $341,962 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIN…COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $232,853 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH …COMMUNITY UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE CENTER: $52,900 · Other
Health$6,993,847Other$1,309,456

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,896,764 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetUniversal Medical Services INC: $754,496 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE: $681,741 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $665,218 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCOOK AREA HEALTH SERVICES INC: $651,356 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetNorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc: $617,262 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetUNITED FAMILY PRACTICE HEALTH CENTER: $480,557 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $437,143 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetOPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER: $394,029 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetOPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC: $355,560 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetLAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $304,969 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCEDAR RIVERSIDE PEOPLE'S CENTER: $267,921 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $232,853 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC: $158,572 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetINDIAN HEALTH BOARD OF MINNEAPOLIS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental of Minne…Ucare MinnesotaNeighborhood Health C…Fuhn Community Care N…American Cancer Socie…Otto Bremer TrustDirect ReliefThe Minneapolis Found…StratacorDelta Dental of Minne…Boston Scientific Fou…American Heart Associ…
Delta Dental of Minnesota FoundationMN26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Minnesota Foundation · Ucare Minnesota · Neighborhood Health Care Network Inc Dba Federally Qualified Health Center Un · Fuhn Community Care Network · American Cancer Society Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Direct Relief · The Minneapolis Foundation · Stratacor · Delta Dental of Minnesota · Boston Scientific Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Minnesota Association of Community Health Centers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Minnesota Association of Community Health Centers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Minnesota Association of Community Health Centers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home