· Public charity
Fuhn Community Care Network
The purpose of fuhn community care netowrk is to establish and operate a cooperative network of federally qualified health centers (fqhc) and other health care providers that will provide better quality care to patients through efficient and collaborative operations and innovative payment arrangements.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AXIS MEDICAL CENTER | $199,575 |
| REGENTS OF THE U OF MN DBA COMMUNITY UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE CENTER | $194,879 |
| UNITED FAMILY MEDICINE | $155,335 |
| CEDAR RIVERSIDE PEOPLE'S CENTER DBA PEOPLE'S CENTER CLINICS & SERVICES | $132,784 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC | $126,798 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE | $124,550 |
| SOUTH SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC | $106,807 |
| INDIAN HEALTH BOARD OF MINNEAPOLIS INC | $102,319 |
| OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER | $89,260 |
| OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER | $45,523 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.
The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.
Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.
At United Hospital District, we exist to provide and promote appropriate health care services to the communities we serve, doing so in a safe and healing environment which supports our patient-centered care philosophy.
Northland community health center is committed to providing access to affordable and quality health services.
Dedicated to providing access to affordable, compassionate, high quality health care for all.
Provide high quality medical, behavioral health, and dental services that are affordable, accessible, and patient-focused.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
Working together as partners to enhance the lives of area residents by providing a neighborhood of patient centered healthcare services that promote wellness, prevention and care coordination.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Family Practice Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Universal Medical Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Universal Medical Services INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED FAMILY PRACTICE HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CEDAR RIVERSIDE PEOPLE'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN HEALTH BOARD OF MINNEAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Neighborhood Health Care Network Inc Dba Federally Qualified Health Center Un · Minnesota Association of Community Health Centers · Ucare Minnesota · Delta Dental of Minnesota Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · Boston Scientific Foundation Inc · Allina Health System · American Cancer Society Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · The Minneapolis Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fuhn Community Care Network funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.