Loading…
· Public charity
FUHN COMMUNITY CARE NETWORK
The purpose of fuhn community care netowrk is to establish and operate a cooperative network of federally qualified health centers (fqhc) and other health care providers that will provide better quality care to patients through efficient and collaborative operations and innovative payment arrangements.
$1.3M
Granted FY2024
10
Grants
1
Communities
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.2M
$126,798
Median grant
1
States reached
$684k
Total assets
Largest grants
- AXIS MEDICAL CENTER$199,575
- REGENTS OF THE U OF MN DBA COMMUNITY UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE CENTER$194,879
- UNITED FAMILY MEDICINE$155,335
- CEDAR RIVERSIDE PEOPLE'S CENTER DBA PEOPLE'S CENTER CLINICS & SERVICES$132,784
- NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC$126,798
- NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE$124,550
- SOUTH SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC$106,807
- INDIAN HEALTH BOARD OF MINNEAPOLIS INC$102,319
- OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER$89,260
- OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER$45,523
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Universal Community Health Center
The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communities and a patient centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.
Health
2
Tri-Cities Community Health
Deliver the highest quality health care to every person, every time.
—
3
Northwest Community Health Care
The organization is a federally qualified health center that provides primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related patient support services to more than 18,000 individuals regardless of ability to pay.
Health
4
One Community Health
To advance health and social justice for all members of our community.
—
5
Regional West Health Services
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Health
6
Interior Community Health Center
Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.
Health
7
Umpqua Community Health Center
Provide quality, compassionate, accessible & affordable healthcare to the people of douglas county.
Health
8
North Olympic Healthcare Network
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
Health
9
Community Health Center of
To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care
Health
10
Midtown Health Center
Provide high quality medical, behavioral health, and denta services that are affordable, accessible, and patient-focused.
Health
11
Community Health Care Inc
Community health care provides primary medical, dental, and behavioral health care to individuals in the communities they serve.
—
12
Northland Health Partners Community
Delivering patient centered, accessible, quality-driven, medical, dental, and behavioral healthcare, to all generations to strengthen the health status in the communities we serve, regardless of the ability to pay
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Family Practice Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Universal Medical Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$958,401Other$319,429
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AXIS MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED FAMILY MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds CEDAR RIVERSIDE PEOPLE'S CENTER DBA PEOPLE'S CENTER CLINICS & SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN HEALTH BOARD OF MINNEAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Minnesota Association of CommunityMN24.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Minnesota Association of Community · Neighborhood Health Care Network Inc · Ucare Minnesota · Delta Dental of Minnesota Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · The Minneapolis Foundation · Medica Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Boston Scientific Foundation Inc · Allina Health System · American Cancer Society Inc · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation FUHN COMMUNITY CARE NETWORK funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AXIS MEDICAL CENTER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 261084365 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on AXIS MEDICAL CENTER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Fuhn Community Care Network?
Find your warmest path to Fuhn Community Care Network through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines