· Public charity
Minnesota Association of Community Health Centers
Enhance minnesota primary health care; increase the efficiency, viability, and strength of minnesota primary health care facilities
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $123k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $271k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER | $86,550 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE | $75,527 |
| SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC | $55,468 |
| SCENIC RIVERS (COOK AREA) | $52,956 |
| UNITED FAMILY MEDICINE | $39,200 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SOURCE | $37,400 |
| COMMUNITY UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE CENTER | $24,900 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC | $21,400 |
| PEOPLE'S HEALTH CNTR CRPC | $8,900 |
| SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC | $8,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWEST SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC3× · 2021–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +6%
- UMUniversal Medical Services INC3× · 2021–2023 · $754k · revenue +13%
- SCSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC5× · 2021–2025 · $665k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAone grant, 2022 · $342k
- IHINDIAN HEALTH BOARD OF MINNEAPOLIS INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +107%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…
Northland community health center is committed to providing access to affordable and quality health services.
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.
Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.
Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.
Provide high quality medical, behavioral health, and dental services that are affordable, accessible, and patient-focused.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
Working together as partners to enhance the lives of area residents by providing a neighborhood of patient centered healthcare services that promote wellness, prevention and care coordination.
To provide quality, affordable health care to all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Family Practice Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Universal Medical Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST SIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Universal Medical Services INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHSOURCE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COOK AREA HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED FAMILY PRACTICE HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CEDAR RIVERSIDE PEOPLE'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN HEALTH BOARD OF MINNEAPOLIS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Minnesota Foundation · Ucare Minnesota · Neighborhood Health Care Network Inc Dba Federally Qualified Health Center Un · Fuhn Community Care Network · American Cancer Society Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Direct Relief · The Minneapolis Foundation · Stratacor · Delta Dental of Minnesota · Boston Scientific Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Minnesota Association of Community Health Centers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.