Skip to content

· Private foundation

Milton & Betty Holcombe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$328k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$847kEducation$332kReligion$255kHuman Services$92kPublic Safety & Disaster$87kCivil Rights$36kPhilanthropy$29kMembership Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$247k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL HERITAGE SOCIETY$100,000
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$100,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,000
LAWRENCE CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST$15,000
NATIONAL TRUST HISTORIC PRESERVATIO$10,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TX HILL COU$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$8,000
SALVATION ARMY$8,000
DAUGHTERS OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION$6,000
ST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL$5,000
AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD TRUST$5,000
JAMES F BYRNES FOUNDATION$5,000
ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL$5,000
CENTRAL FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $24k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
SD
IA
VA
NC
SC
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 30 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
11

Total granted

$1.7M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+81%

Still filing today

37%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Central Heritage Society
    9× · 2017–2025 · $670k · revenue +66% · 100% of their budget
  • WU
    Winthrop University Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +120%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2021–2025 · $77k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CA
    CREATIVE ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • LC
    LAWRENCE CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UD
    UNITED DAUGHTERS OF THE CONFEDERACYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The South Carolina Historical Society

The schs mission is to expand, preserve, and make accessible our invaluable collection, and to encourage interest and pride in the rich history of our state.

Arts & Culture
2
The North Caroliniana Society

To promote interest in, knowledge of, and appreciation for north carolina history and culture through historical preservation, library service, and perpetuation of state literary and cultural heritage.

—
3
United States Capitol Historical Society

Today, with the formal approval of congress, the society continues exploring and instituting new and creative ways to bring the fascinating story of the capitol, its institutions and america's unique history to people across the nation and…

Arts & Culture
4
Association for the Preservation of Va Antiquities

To preserve, promote and serve as an advocate for virginia's irreplaceable historic places for cultural, economic and educational benefits for everyone.

Arts & Culture
5
Tudor Place Foundation Inc

Tudor place historic house & garden preserves the stories of six generations of descendants of martha washington and the enslaved and free people who lived and worked at this georgetown landmark for nearly two centuries. by examining their…

—
6
Georgia Trust for Historic Preservation Inc

The georgia trust works for the preservation and revitalization of georgia's diverse historic resources and advocates for their appreciation, protection, and use.

Arts & Culture
7
The Rhode Island Historical Society

The rhode island historical society, through its collections, museums, and educational initiatives, welcomes everyone to engage with rhode island's complex and significant past.

Arts & Culture
8
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
9
Massachusetts Historical Society

To promote understanding of the history of massachusetts and the nation by collecting and communicating materials and resources that foster historical knowledge.

Arts & Culture
10
National Society of the Colonial Dames of America in the State of Sc

The national society of the colonial dames of america in the state of south carolina is dedicated to furthering knowledge and appreciation of our colonial/national heritage through historic preservation, patriotic service, and educational…

Arts & Culture
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation

Preserve, restore, reconstruct, or otherwise maintain historical structures, objects, works of art and locations and to promote, encourage, and carry on any historical, interpretive, research, or related educational activities.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parish Episcopal School; the most unlike its peers is James F Byrnes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Central Heritage Society: $670,000 · Arts & CultureCentral Heritage SocietyAmerican Battlefield Trust: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $14,500 · Arts & CultureFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $99,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHLAWRENCE CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST: $86,000 · OtherLAWRENCE CHAPEL UNITED METHODISTSALVATION ARMY: $75,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL: $57,000 · OtherST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOLDAUGHTERS OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $51,000 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF AMERICAN REVOLUTIONNATIONAL TRUST HISTORIC PRESERVATIO: $43,105 · OtherNATIONAL TRUST HISTORIC PRESERVATIOST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $33,000 · OtherJAMES F BYRNES FOUNDATION: $29,000 · OtherCENTRAL FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $24,000 · Other+22 more: $190,500 · Other+22 moreWinthrop University Foundation: $223,000 · EducationWinthrop Univer…+3 more: $10,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $77,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,000 · ReligionPINNACLE PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$709,500Other$687,605Education$233,000Human Services$77,000Religion$20,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCentral Heritage Society: $670,000 over 9y, 100% of budgetWinthrop University Foundation: $223,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $77,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES F BYRNES FOUNDATION: $29,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust: $25,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPICKENS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $22,000 over 9y, 7.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARDSON WOMANS CLUB: $14,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREENHILL SCHOOL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Central Heritage Society ↗
  • Who funds Winthrop University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds JAMES F BYRNES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Battlefield Trust ↗
  • Who funds PICKENS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds RICHARDSON WOMANS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED DAUGHTERS OF THE CONFEDERACY ↗
  • Who funds GREENHILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PINNACLE PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PEO Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milton & Betty Holcombe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milton & Betty Holcombe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Milton & Betty Holcombe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph