Skip to content

· Private foundation

Milos Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$125kEducation$45kRecreation & Sports$40kYouth Development$12kHealth$9kPhilanthropy$7kCommunity Improvement$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,900
Median grant
1
States reached
$911
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUSSVILLE CITY SCHOOLS$3,000
OAK MOUNTAIN CITY SCHOOLS$3,000
PELHAM CITY SCHOOLS$2,900
HOMEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL$2,300
GARDENDALE QUARTERBACK CLUB$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YMCA OF BIRMINGHAM: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$38k · 4 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
35

Total granted

$38k
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+14%

Still filing today

25%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentScience & TechFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $15k
  • MB
    Mountain Brook Sports Corporation
    2× · 2018–2019 · $15k · revenue +21%
  • HH
    HOMEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL PTO
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue -18%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE HIGHLANDS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $125k
  • LC
    LEE COUNTY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • MF
    MOODY FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
2
The Medical Foundation of Alabama

To further the image of medicine through financial support for health education programs and projects

—
3
The West Alabama Chamber Foundation Inc

To solicit, collect and administer funds and property to be used soley for charitable, educational, religious or scientific purposes.

—
4
Urology Health Foundation

The Urology Health Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 2003 by Birmingham urologist Dr. Thomas E. Moody. Its purposes are to educate physicians and other medical professionals in new techniques and procedures being…

Education
5
Alabama Public Health Association Inc

The alabama public health association, inc., is an association of individuals and organizations interested in public health in alabama. the mission of the association is to link individuals and organizations in addressing public health…

Health
6
Pike Medical Foundation

To provide financial support to a community owned hospital

—
7
Alabama Christian Academy

To glorify god by providing a quality, christ-centered education which challenges students and teachers to maximize their potential so that graduates are prepared to further their education while becoming productive christian citizens.

—
8
Alabama School of Healthcare Sciences Foundation

Provide financial and other resources for the benefit and support of the Alabama School of Health Sciences, a specialty high school within the Alabama public school system that will offer curricula, instruction and training primarily…

Education
9
Alabama Archives & History Foundation

To raise funds to support the work of the Alabama Department of Archives and History, Alabama's State Archival and Museum agency.

Arts & Culture
10
Chris Hammond Youth Foundation Inc

To provide financial help with recreational facilities in rural alabama and maintain athletic facility in rural alabama for use by all regardless of race or ethnic background.

Youth Development
11
Chcs Foundation Inc

Provide funding for and ownership of educational facilities.

Education
12
Cullman First United Methodist Church Foundation

To receive gifts, bequest, insurance proceeds and investment income. formed to pay for major repairs, renovations, equipment and other expenses of first united methodist church in cullman, alabama.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cullman Regional Medical Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lee County Youth Development Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE HIGHLANDS INC: $125,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE HIGHLANDS INCMOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOLMountain Brook Sports Corporation: $15,000 · OtherMountain Brook Sports CorporationMOODY FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB: $10,000 · OtherPelham High School: $8,000 · Other+28 more: $39,986 · Other+28 moreLEE COUNTY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10,000 · Crime & LegalNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyWALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Cullman County Inc: $1,000 · PhilanthropyHOMEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL PTO: $4,600 · EducationDCH Foundation Inc: $900 · EducationDECATUR MORGAN HOSPITAL: $2,295 · HealthJACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $900 · HealthCULLMAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC: $450 · HealthCLAY-CHALKVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB INC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BIRMINGHAM INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$212,986Crime & Legal$10,000Philanthropy$7,000Education$5,500Health$3,645Recreation & Sports$2,500Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMountain Brook Sports Corporation: $15,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetLEE COUNTY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOMEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL PTO: $4,600 over 2y, 10% of budgetCLAY-CHALKVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDECATUR MORGAN HOSPITAL: $2,295 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BIRMINGHAM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAISING ARROWS: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDCH Foundation Inc: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULLMAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRATTVILLE CHRISTIAN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mountain Brook Sports Corporation ↗
  • Who funds LEE COUNTY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL PTO ↗
  • Who funds CLAY-CHALKVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR MORGAN HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BIRMINGHAM INC ↗
  • Who funds RAISING ARROWS ↗
  • Who funds WALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Cullman County Inc ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DCH Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CULLMAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHEPHERD SUPPLY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Maynard Nexsen Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milos Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milos Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Milos Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Milos Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Milos’ filings →

    More from the funding graph