Skip to content

· Private foundation

Milne Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$118kArts & Culture$108kCommunity Improvement$59kEnvironment$43kHuman Services$28kCrime & Legal$20kHealth$18kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$922k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAUDATO SI' PROJECT$10,000
ASSOCIATION OF MIDWEST MUSEUMS$5,000
COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE$5,000
CONFERENCE ON ASIANPACIFIC LDSP$5,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$5,000
UW SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE$5,000
SHARP LITERACY$5,000
ILLINOIS PRISON PROJECT$5,000
BRAVEHEARTS$5,000
BERNIE'S BOOK BANK$5,000
HISTORIC HAYMARKET MILWAUKEE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%SHARP LITERACY: $5k → 17%Bravehearts Therapeutic Riding and Educational Center: $5k → 6%SHARP LITERACY: $5k → 17%Bravehearts Therapeutic Riding and Educational Center: $5k → 6%SHARP LITERACY: $5k → 17%BRAVEHEARTS: $5k → 6%SHARP LITERACY: $5k → 17%BRAVEHEARTS: $5k → 6%Sharp Literacy: $3k → 17%Bravehearts Therapeutic Riding and Educational Center: $5k → 6%Sharp Literacy: $3k → 17%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND: $3k → 6%SHARP LITERACY: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 20 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$410k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-24%

Still filing today

70%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LAUDATO SI PROJECT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +944%
  • SHARP LITERACY INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $28k · revenue +8%
  • BT
    BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER
    6× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • GOOD FRIEND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -24%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
2
Children's Museum of Oak Park

To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.

Arts & Culture
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
5
Council of Independent Colleges

The council of independent colleges is an association of nonprofit independent colleges and universities, state- based councils of independent colleges, and other higher education affiliates, that works to support college and university…

—
6
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
7
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
8
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
9
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
10
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Forward Collective Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sharp Literacy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO: $65,000 · Arts & CultureINGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGOTHE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUMLOOKINGGLASS THEATRE COMPANY: $14,500 · Arts & CultureLOOKINGGLASS THEATRE COMPANYHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee IncChicago Symphony Orchestra: $10,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony OrchestraDiscovery World Museum: $30,000 · OtherDiscovery World MuseumUniversity of WI Foundation - School of Veterinary Medicine: $15,000 · OtherUniversity of WI Foundation - …ASSOCIATION OF MIDWEST MUSEUM: $13,500 · OtherASSOCIATION OF MIDWEST MUSEUMUW SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $10,000 · OtherUW SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICI…ILLINOIS PRISON PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherILLINOIS PRISON PROJECTIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherASSOCIATION OF MIDWEST MUSEUMS: $5,000 · OtherRESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherRESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION+4 more: $11,000 · Other+4 moreCONFERENCE ON ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP: $50,000 · Community ImprovementCONFERENCE ON A…THE COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE COMMUNITY W…SHARP LITERACY INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesSHARP LITERACY…BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $27,500 · Human ServicesBRAVEHEARTS TH…LAUDATO SI PROJECT INC: $40,000 · ReligionLAUDATO SI…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationVanderbilt University: $5,000 · EducationCITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC: $2,500 · EducationBERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $15,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$124,500Other$118,000Community Improvement$60,000Human Services$55,000Religion$40,000Education$22,500Youth Development$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO: $65,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCONFERENCE ON ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP: $50,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetLAUDATO SI PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetSHARP LITERACY INC: $27,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $27,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOOKINGGLASS THEATRE COMPANY: $14,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetILLINOIS PRISON PROJECT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVanderbilt University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD FRIEND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUEC MVP PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 40% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CONFERENCE ON ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds LAUDATO SI PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARP LITERACY INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BERNIE'S BOOK BANK ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOOKINGGLASS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS PRISON PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds GOOD FRIEND INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds UEC MVP PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI16.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Joseph & Bessie Feinberg Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milne Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milne Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Milne Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph