Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mills Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2020
4
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Arts & Culture$50kEducation$28kReligion$8kYouth Development$8kAnimals$6kCommunity Improvement$5kHuman Services$3kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEORIA RIVERFRONT MUSEUM$10,000
READING LEGACIES$2,500
TRANSDANCE$2,500
SDSU GOLF AZTEC CLUB$1,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Developmental Services Center: $250 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 11 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +134% since the first grant, against +66% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
20

Total granted

$91k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
+66%

Still filing today

36%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Arts & CultureAnimalsYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    Peoria Riverfront Museum
    4× · 2017–2020 · $41k · revenue +105%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +127%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO HUMAN SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • BM
    Busey Mills Community Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
2
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
3
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
4
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
7
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
8
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
9
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
10
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
11
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

—
12
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Developmental Services Center of Champaign County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY: $11,500 · OtherFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFirst Federated Church: $5,000 · OtherFirst Federated ChurchProKids: $4,700 · OtherProKidsTRANSDANCE: $4,500 · OtherTRANSDANCETrancenDance: $3,500 · OtherTrancenDanceSAN DIEGO HUMAN SOCIETY: $2,500 · OtherBusey Mills Community Foundation: $2,500 · OtherThe High School of St Thomas More: $2,250 · Other+14 more: $11,822 · Other+14 morePeoria Riverfront Museum: $41,000 · Arts & CulturePeoria Riverfront MuseumTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCI…University of Illinois Foundation: $10,250 · EducationUniversit…ACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY: $3,470 · Youth DevelopmentREADING LEGACIES: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $3,500 · AnimalsCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $2,000 · AnimalsACCESSITY: $2,000 · Community ImprovementPEORIA FRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE: $100 · Community ImprovementDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC: $250 · Human Services
Other$58,272Arts & Culture$43,500Education$10,250Youth Development$5,970Animals$5,500Community Improvement$2,100Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPeoria Riverfront Museum: $41,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $10,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY: $3,470 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREADING LEGACIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWD BOYCE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $622 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREST PRESERVE FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEORIA FRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Peoria Riverfront Museum ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds READING LEGACIES ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSITY ↗
  • Who funds WD BOYCE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOREST PRESERVE FRIENDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PEORIA FRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mills FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mills Foundation · United Way of Champaign County · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mills Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mills Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mills Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mills Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mills Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph