Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mills Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48k
Granted FY2019
12
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Mills Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Greene County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Mills Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $48k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
6
18
10
19
2
20
2
21
0
22
1
23
2
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$696kHuman Services$47kFood & Nutrition$29kInternational$14kCommunity Improvement$10kHousing & Shelter$10kPhilanthropy$7kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2019 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k11 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$302k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAYBREAK$10,000
INTERNATIONAL NEEDS$6,840
ONE BISTRO INC (XENIA)$6,789
DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
DOWNTOWN MIAMISBURG INC$5,000
MARCH OF DIMES - GREATER MIAMI VALLEY$5,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$3,500
MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,000
GRANDVIEW FOUNDATION$1,000
PINK RIBBON GIRLS$1,000
FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN$1,000
ARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $694k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AGAPE FOR YOUTH: $1k → 14%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $200 → 9%DAYBREAK: $10k → 14%DAYBREAK: $10k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $10k → 14%DAYBREAK: $10k → 14%HOSPICE OF DAYTON: $653k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

11%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$89k · 7 repeat orgs$728k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$89k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+70%

Still filing today

71%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IN
    INTERNATIONAL NEEDS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue +37%
  • AC
    ARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +30%
  • PR
    PINK RIBBON GOOD INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +438%

Funded once

  • PT
    Plaza Theatre Associationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +70%
  • NS
    National Society to Prevent BlindnessOhio Affiliate
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -14%
  • AF
    AGAPE FOR YOUTH INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Miami County Inc

The hospice of miami county, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards.…

2
Hospice of Fayette County Inc

Provide home or nursing home care for terminally ill patients and their families. provided education & support to fayette county and surrounding communities about qualify of life issues.

3
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

4
Good Samaritan Hospital

We will improve the health of the communities we serve with others who share our commitment to provide high-quality, cost-competitive healthcare services.

5
Lifecare Hospice

The mission of hospice is to provide medical care, nursing care, pain relief, and emotional and spiritual support services to terminally ill patients and their families.

6
Ohio's Hospice Foundation

Ohio's hospice foundation is a supportive foundation of its sole member, ohio's hospice inc. and its supported organizations. the foundation provides counsel and assistance for ohio's hospice and its supported organizations by helping to…

Health
7
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Dayton

Ronald mcdonald house charities of dayton's mission is to provide community, comfort, and hope to families of seriously ill children.

8
Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

9
Children's Home Care of Dayton

To provide quality home health services to infants, children, and young adults. the care provided will be coordinated, comprehensive, and family centered to meet the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the children and their…

Health
10
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
11
Ohio Living Holdings

See schedule oto provide older adults with caring and quality services toward enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well-being consistent with the christian gospel. the organization is dedicated to living our mission and keeping…

Human Services
12
Dayton Clinical Oncology Program Inc

To reduce cancer incidence and mortality through improved treatment and prevention by offering national, state-of-the-art cancer research to local communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dayton Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Downtown Miamisburg Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr14%30%20–35yr17%40%35–55yr20%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr14%3%20–35yr17%91%35–55yr20%1%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
11%
424/3,765

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC — $653,241 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF DAYTON INCDAYBREAK INC — $30,000 · Human Services+3 more — $11,200 · Human ServicesONE BISTRO INC (XENIA) — $15,789 · OtherINTERNATIONAL NEEDS — $13,680 · OtherDOWNTOWN MIAMISBURG INC — $10,000 · OtherMICHAEL'S HOUSE — $10,000 · OtherMARCH OF DIMES - GREATER MIAMI VALLEY — $5,000 · OtherARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $3,500 · Other+7 more — $7,276 · OtherBRIGID'S PATH INC — $25,000 · HealthONE BISTRO INC — $13,000 · HealthDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,500 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $3,000 · HealthMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthGREENE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyPlaza Theatre Association — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$694,441Other$65,245Health$52,500Philanthropy$7,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC — $653,241 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDAYBREAK INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBRIGID'S PATH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL NEEDS — $13,680 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetONE BISTRO INC — $13,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlaza Theatre Association — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE FOR YOUTH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrandview Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOR LOVE OF CHILDREN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DAYTON INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationOH31.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · Mathile Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · WPCU Sunshine Community Fund · Levin Family Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The Fred and Alice Wallace Charitable Memorial Foundation · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · The Berry Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mills Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mills Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mills Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph