Skip to content

· Private foundation

Miller Don Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$278kHealth$4k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$962k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,600
MID-AMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY$3,600
UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO$3,600
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY$3,600
UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO$3,600
MOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING$3,500
ASHLAND UNIVERSITY$3,500
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON$3,500
MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOL$3,500
NORTHPOINT COLLEGE$3,500
ASHLAND UNIVERSITY$2,000
ANDERSON UNIVERSITY$2,000
ASHLAND UNIVERSITY$2,000
OWENS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHPOINT COLLEGE: $4k → 11%SPRING ARBOR UNIVERSITY: $500 → 13%MID-AMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 5%MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOL: $4k → 16%DEPAUW UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%HEIDELBERG UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%OWENS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $4k → 13%MALONE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 13%OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY: $500 → 15%MOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING: $4k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $4k → 18%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $4k → 18%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
IN
OH
PA
MO
KY
KS
NC
SC
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 11 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
55

Total granted

$53k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+12%

Still filing today

45%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    Spring Arbor University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +20%
  • HU
    Heidelberg University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +0%
  • BW
    Baldwin Wallace University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOWLING GREEN ST UNIV FBO
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • IU
    INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV FBO
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
3
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
4
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
5
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
6
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
7
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
8
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
9
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
10
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
11
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
12
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Northern University; the most unlike its peers is Messiah University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $11,950 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TOLEDOBOWLING GREEN ST UNIV FBO: $9,600 · OtherBOWLING GREEN ST UNIV FBOOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $7,555 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $6,000 · OtherMISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOL: $6,000 · Other+58 more: $118,803 · Other+58 moreASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · EducationASHLAND UNIVERSITYSpring Arbor University: $5,500 · EducationSpring Arbor Univers…Heidelberg University: $3,610 · EducationHeidelberg Universit…MIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $3,600 · EducationMIDAMERICA NAZARENE …DePauw University: $3,600 · EducationDePauw UniversityMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationMESSIAH UNIVERSITYBaldwin Wallace University: $2,105 · EducationBaldwin Wallace Univ…Ohio Northern University: $2,055 · EducationOhio Northern Univer…MALONE UNIVERSITY: $2,055 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITYANDERSON UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 · EducationANDERSON UNIVERSITY …Tiffin University: $1,555 · Education
Other$159,908Education$36,080

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpring Arbor University: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHeidelberg University: $3,610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDePauw University: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHPOINT COLLEGE: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $2,105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOhio Northern University: $2,055 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $2,055 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTiffin University: $1,555 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Spring Arbor University ↗
  • Who funds Heidelberg University ↗
  • Who funds MIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DePauw University ↗
  • Who funds NORTHPOINT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING ↗
  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berry Marie D Fd H PfdnOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berry Marie D Fd H Pfdn · Council of Independent Colleges · Folds of Honor Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Miller Don Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Miller Don Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Miller Don’s filings →

    More from the funding graph