Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Miller Don Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$278kHealth$4k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$962k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY$3,600
UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO$3,600
INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,600
UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO$3,600
MID-AMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY$3,600
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON$3,500
NORTHPOINT COLLEGE$3,500
MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOL$3,500
MOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING$3,500
ASHLAND UNIVERSITY$3,500
ASHLAND UNIVERSITY$2,000
ANDERSON UNIVERSITY$2,000
ASHLAND UNIVERSITY$2,000
OWENS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHPOINT COLLEGE: $4k → 11%SPRING ARBOR UNIVERSITY: $500 → 13%MID-AMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 5%MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOL: $4k → 16%DEPAUW UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%HEIDELBERG UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%OWENS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $4k → 13%MALONE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 13%OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY: $500 → 15%MOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING: $4k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $4k → 18%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $4k → 18%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
MI
IN
OH
PA
MO
KY
KS
NC
SC
MS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$53k · 11 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
55

Total granted

$53k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+12%

Still filing today

45%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    Spring Arbor University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +20%
  • HU
    Heidelberg University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +0%
  • BW
    Baldwin Wallace University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOWLING GREEN ST UNIV FBO
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • BU
    BUTLER UNIV FBO MACY CANSDALE
    one grant, 2023 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
3
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
4
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
5
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
6
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

7
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
8
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
9
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
10
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

11
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
12
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Northern University and the most unlike its peers is Messiah University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO — $11,950 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TOLEDOBOWLING GREEN ST UNIV FBO — $9,600 · OtherBOWLING GREEN ST UNIV FBOOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $7,555 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY — $6,000 · OtherMISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOL — $6,000 · Other+58 more — $118,803 · Other+58 moreASHLAND UNIVERSITY — $7,500 · EducationASHLAND UNIVERSITYSpring Arbor University — $5,500 · EducationSpring Arbor Univers…Heidelberg University — $3,610 · EducationHeidelberg Universit…DePauw University — $3,600 · EducationDePauw UniversityMIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $3,600 · EducationMIDAMERICA NAZARENE …MESSIAH UNIVERSITY — $2,500 · EducationMESSIAH UNIVERSITYBaldwin Wallace University — $2,105 · EducationBaldwin Wallace Univ…MALONE UNIVERSITY — $2,055 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITYOhio Northern University — $2,055 · EducationOhio Northern Univer…ANDERSON UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 · EducationANDERSON UNIVERSITY …Tiffin University — $1,555 · Education
Other$159,908Education$36,080

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpring Arbor University — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHeidelberg University — $3,610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDePauw University — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHPOINT COLLEGE — $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University — $2,105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY — $2,055 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOhio Northern University — $2,055 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTiffin University — $1,555 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Spring Arbor University
  • Who funds Heidelberg University
  • Who funds DePauw University
  • Who funds MIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NORTHPOINT COLLEGE
  • Who funds MOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING
  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berry Marie D Fd H PfdnOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berry Marie D Fd H Pfdn · Council of Independent Colleges · Folds of Honor Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Miller Don Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph