· Private foundation
Milk Money Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $36,000 |
| THANK ISRAELI SOLDIERS | $18,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES | $10,000 |
| MOMENTUM | $10,000 |
| YEHUDI INC | $5,000 |
| PROCLAIMING JUSTICE TO THE NATIONS | $3,600 |
| OHR TORAH STONE INSTITUTIONS OF ISRAEL | $3,600 |
| CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL | $3,600 |
| THE INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM | $3,600 |
| THE CLARION PROJECT | $2,500 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MA'AGALIM | $2,000 |
| BOCA RATON KOLLEL | $1,800 |
| ISRAEL AIR FORCE CENTER FOUNDATION INC | $1,800 |
| TORAH LIVE INC | $1,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +147%
- MUMOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC7× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +68%
- YIYehudi Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +116%
Funded once
- TTTHE TIKVAH FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +199%
- JOJUST ONE LIFE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +40%
- OMOPENDOR MEDIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +108%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.
The organization seeks to reinforce the foundations of israel as a jewish and democratic state. it acts to promote programs to educate the israeli public on the importance of both values and to demonstrate how each contributes to and…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opendor Media Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Tikvah Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds Yehudi Inc ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL AIRFORCE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds CLARION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROCLAIMING JUSTICE TO THE NATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL SECURITY ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE TIKVAH FUND ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH ↗
- Who funds JUST ONE LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds SEFARIA INC ↗
- Who funds TORAH LIVE INC ↗
- Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Hager Foundation · Mayberg Foundation Inc · The Irving I Moskowitz Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Milk Money Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Yehudi Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.