Skip to content
Miles of Hope Breast Cancer Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Miles of Hope Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to fund support services, outreach, and education to people affected by breast cancer within the nine counties of the hudson valley, new york (columbia, dutchess, greene, orange, putnam, rockland, sullivan, ulster and westchester counties).

$306k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.2MHuman Services$242k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $261,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $305,980 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,480 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $222k
$17,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTHCARE$135,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR DUTCHESS COUNTY INC$87,000
BREAST CANCER OPTIONS$17,000
SUPPORT CONNECTION INC$15,000
CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $458k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $87k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $75k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR DC: $73k → 9%DUTCHESS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $73k → 9%DUTCHESS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $65k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $45k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$1.4M
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+2%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR DUTCHESS COUNTY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $458k · revenue +29%
  • CF
    CORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTHCARE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $428k · revenue +114%
  • FO
    FAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $254k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • VB
    Vassar Brothers Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -73%
  • CH
    COLUMBIA-GREENE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • YW
    YWCA WHITE PLAINS & CENTRAL WESTCHESTER INC AND ITS AFFILIATES
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vassar Brothers Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
2
The Hospital of Central Connecticut

The Hospital of Central Connecticut is dedicated to fostering, sustaining and improving the health status of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
The Norwalk Hospital Association

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
4
Family Services of Westchester Inc

Family services of westchester offers a broad range of social and mental health services to strengthen and support families, children and individuals at every stages of the life cycle from infancy to adulthood.

—
5
Vassar Health Connecticut Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
6
The William W Backus Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
7
Canton-Potsdam Hospital

Canton potsdam hospital's mission is to provide skilled, compassionate, cost-effective care that promotes wellness and meets community needs.

Health
8
Western Connecticut Health Network Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
9
Rochester Regional Health

The organization is organized and operated for the benefit of all of the affiliates within rochester regional health system. the organization supports and assists the affiliates by reviewing and monitoring their missions, objectives,…

Health
10
The Unity Hospital of Rochester

See schedule oto make a positive difference in the lives and health status of individuals in the city of rochester, ny and western monroe county. we will educate our community, our providers, and future health care professionals in order…

Health
11
Northwell Health Cancer Institute Inc

Northwell health cancer institute is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
12
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Support Community Greater Ny & Ct Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breast Cancer Options Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTHCARE: $427,500 · HealthCORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTHCAREFAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC: $253,500 · HealthFAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INCCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $76,000 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INCBREAST CANCER OPTIONS INC: $57,500 · HealthBREAST CANCER OPTIONS INC+3 more: $22,580 · HealthCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $458,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR DU…SUPPORT CONNECTION INC: $129,000 · Arts & CultureSUPPORT C…WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementYWCA WHITE PLAINS & CENTRAL WESTCHESTER INC AND ITS AFFILIATES: $7,500 · OtherFALLKILL CREATIVE WORKS: $6,458 · Other
Health$837,080Human Services$458,000Arts & Culture$129,000Community Improvement$25,000Other$13,958

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $458,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTHCARE: $427,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC: $253,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSUPPORT CONNECTION INC: $129,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $76,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetBREAST CANCER OPTIONS INC: $57,500 over 5y, 21% of budgetWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVassar Brothers Hospital Foundation: $10,080 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA-GREENE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYWCA WHITE PLAINS & CENTRAL WESTCHESTER INC AND ITS AFFILIATES: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations…Field Hall FoundationPcsb Community Founda…The Thomas and Agnes …United Way of Westche…The Dyson FoundationPeckham Family Founda…Mother Cabrini Health…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…
Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley IncNY26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Field Hall Foundation · Pcsb Community Foundation · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · United Way of Westchester and Putnam · The Dyson Foundation · Peckham Family Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Miles of Hope Breast Cancer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Miles of Hope Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Miles of Hope Breast Cancer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home