Skip to content

New Jersey · Private foundation

Mikita Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2020
19
Itemized grants FY2020
19
Organizations funded FY2020
11%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2020
$12k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2020
$500
Largest grant, FY2020
$2,500
Organizations funded a year
19 to 22
FY2019 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
11
Total assets, FY2020
$444k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 11% of the organizations Mikita Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202019$12k11%
FY201922$14kn/a
78% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$5kAnimals$4kEnvironment$4kHealth$4kEducation$3kPublic Benefit$2kHousing & Shelter$1kHuman Services$500Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Bonefish & Tarpon Trust Inc$3,25020%
Missionaries of the Poor USA Inc$2,3802n/a
Cato Institute$2,00020%
Big Hole River Foundation Inc$2,00021%
Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc$1,20020%
Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur$1,0002n/a
Trinity College$1,00020%
Arizona Humane Society$50520%
Fordham University$50010%
Gifford Youth Achievement Center Inc$30010%
Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Mikita Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Bonefish & Tarpon Trust Inc$3,25020%
Missionaries of the Poor USA Inc$2,3802n/a
Cato Institute$2,00020%
Big Hole River Foundation Inc$2,00021%
Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc$1,20020%
Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur$1,0002n/a
Trinity College$1,00020%
Arizona Humane Society$50520%
Fordham University$50010%
Gifford Youth Achievement Center Inc$30010%
Habitat for Humanity Central Arizona$30020%
Foundation for Blind Children$2001n/a
Archbishop Stepinac High School$2002n/a

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($11k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Mikita Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBonefish & Tarpon Trust Inc: $3,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCato Institute: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBig Hole River Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCrohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity College: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $505 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGifford Youth Achievement Center Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Central Arizona: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mikita Foundation with peer funders

About Mikita Foundation

How much does Mikita Foundation give?
Mikita Foundation reported 19 itemized grants totaling $12,370, out of $14,070 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 19 and 22 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2020.
What does Mikita Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2020, its largest causes are Religion (4%), Animals (3%), Environment (3%).
Who are Mikita Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2020: Bonefish & Tarpon Trust Inc ($3k), Missionaries of the Poor USA Inc ($2k), Cato Institute ($2k).
Does Mikita Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 11% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Mikita Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mikita Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Verizon Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Mikita Foundation based?
Mikita Foundation is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $30k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mikita’s filings →

More from the funding graph