Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mike and Linda Van Daele Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$4.8MFood & Nutrition$1.8MEducation$1.7MHuman Services$1.5MYouth Development$1.0MInternational$959kHousing & Shelter$408kHealth$261kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $137k
$11,400
Median grant
3
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
SMILE SEEKERS$24,000
BRIGHT VISION ORPHAN CARE$15,000
IGLESIA BAUTISTA NUEVO NACIMIENTO$12,000
MISSION STREAM$11,400
CHURCH ON THE HILL$10,000
TODAY'S URBAN RENEWAL NETWORK$10,000
GARDEN CITY CHURCH$8,000
FOCUS ON FAMILY$5,000
PATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES$5,000
BAND OF BROTHERS OUTREACH INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TODAY'S URBAN RENEWAL NETWORK: $40k → 14%EPIPHANY LIFE CHANGE: $25k → 16%TODAY'S URBAN RENEWAL NETWORK: $15k → 14%GLOBAL OUTREACH: $5k → 11%CORONA LIFE SERVICES: $5k → 11%CORONA LIFE SERVICES: $4k → 11%CORONA LIFE SERVICES: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Mike and Linda Van Daele Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 82% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 75%.

Mike and Linda Van Daele Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 46 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +69% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
16

Total granted

$12M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+69%

Still filing today

46%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +15%
  • BC
    Baja Christian Ministries
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +13%
  • TJ
    THE JOSHUA FUND
    4× · 2021–2024 · $411k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • FO
    FOCUS ON THE FAMILY
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • TM
    The Master's Academy International Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $66k · revenue +148%
  • EC
    EMMANUEL CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
2
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
3
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
4
Verticle Living Ministries

To equip disciples of Jesus Christ to balance and live their lives to glorify God in every area of life; spirituall, personally, communally and physically by

Religion
5
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion
6
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
7
Bowlin Ministries Nc

Evangelist

Religion
8
Light in the World Ministries

Christian Pastoral Leadership and Bible Training

International
9
Biblical Education By Extension Inc

To assist the church, primarily in closed countries, in the establishment of continuing indigenous church-based training centers in which servant leaders are equipped to develop growing and reproducing churches.

Religion
10
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
11
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
12
Christlife Ministries

Assist Christian leadership

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth With a Mission - San Diegobaja; the most unlike its peers is Bright Vision Orphan Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
24/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVESTORG: $1,800,000 · OtherHARVESTORGCALVARY CHAPEL OF COSTA MESA: $1,026,700 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL OF COSTA MESAFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $1,000,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYMENIFEE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $749,000 · OtherMENIFEE CHRISTIAN CHURCHTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERN: $681,005 · OtherTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERNWORLD IMPACT INC: $607,049 · OtherWORLD IMPACT INCINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION: $465,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATIONSMILE SEEKERS INC: $344,000 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF: $303,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $290,000 · Other+30 more: $1,412,130 · Other+30 moreBaja Christian Ministries: $1,187,130 · ReligionBaja Christian Minist…THE JOSHUA FUND: $411,000 · ReligionTHE JOSHUA FUNDPATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $408,000 · ReligionPATH OF LIFE MINISTRI…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $200,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSECompletion Global Inc: $162,655 · ReligionCompletion Global IncYOUTH WITH A MISSION - SAN DIEGOBAJA: $98,500 · Religion+5 more: $162,576 · Religion+5 moreBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $1,251,000 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERSI…WOODCREST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SYSTEM: $250,000 · EducationWOODCREST CHRI…OAK VALLEY COLLEGE: $200,000 · EducationOAK VALLEY COL…+1 more: $15,000 · EducationMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $137,500 · HealthRiverside Life Services: $73,000 · HealthInspire Life Skills Training Inc: $61,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · HealthTODAYS URBAN RENEWAL NETWORK INC: $96,500 · Human ServicesCorona Life Services dba Zoi: $57,250 · Human ServicesEPIPHANY LIFE CHANGE: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesBRIGHT VISION ORPHAN CARE: $52,000 · InternationalHOPE NOW FOR YOUTH INC: $42,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$8,677,884Religion$2,629,861Education$1,716,000Health$289,500Human Services$183,750International$52,000Crime & Legal$42,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $1,251,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBaja Christian Ministries: $1,187,130 over 8y, 24% of budgetTHE JOSHUA FUND: $411,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetPATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $408,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetWOODCREST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SYSTEM: $250,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOAK VALLEY COLLEGE: $200,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCompletion Global Inc: $162,655 over 6y, 31% of budgetMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $137,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTODAYS URBAN RENEWAL NETWORK INC: $96,500 over 4y, 33% of budgetRiverside Life Services: $73,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetInspire Life Skills Training Inc: $61,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetCorona Life Services dba Zoi: $57,250 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetBRIGHT VISION ORPHAN CARE: $52,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetHOPE NOW FOR YOUTH INC: $42,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetLiving Shield Ministries: $35,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetJosiah Venture: $30,176 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAND OF BROTHERS OUTREACH INC: $20,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN BIBLE COLLEGES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTH CHOICE OF SAN MARCOS: $14,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetGlocal Outreach: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Baja Christian Ministries ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSHUA FUND ↗
  • Who funds PATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WOODCREST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds OAK VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Completion Global Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION - SAN DIEGOBAJA ↗
  • Who funds TODAYS URBAN RENEWAL NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Riverside Life Services ↗
  • Who funds The Master's Academy International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Inspire Life Skills Training Inc ↗
  • Who funds Corona Life Services dba Zoi ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT VISION ORPHAN CARE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE NOW FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Living Shield Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Josiah Venture ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Community FoundationCA18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Power Ministry · Serving USA Inc Fka Serving California · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mike and Linda Van Daele Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mike and Linda Van Daele Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mike and Linda Van Daele Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph