Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mielcarek Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$307k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$260kHuman Services$214kHealth$153kReligion$126kRecreation & Sports$60kHousing & Shelter$25kYouth Development$24kCivil Rights$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $205k
$22,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUN PRAIRIE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$55,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$25,000
SUNSHINE PLACE$22,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$15,000
GILDA'S CLUB MADISON$10,000
YMCA OF DANE COUNTY$10,000
TELLURIAN INC$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$5,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Sunshine Place: $50k → 10%SUNSHINE PLACE: $22k → 10%Sunshine Place: $15k → 10%SUNSHINE PLACE: $10k → 10%Sunshine Place: $8k → 10%SUNSHINE PLACE: $5k → 10%Sunshine Place: $3k → 10%SUNSHINE PLACE: $2k → 10%YMCA OF DANE COUNTY: $10k → 10%YMCA of Dane County: $10k → 10%YMCA of Dane County: $10k → 10%YMCA of Dane County: $10k → 10%GILDA'S CLUB MADISON: $10k → 10%Gildas Club Madison: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$537k · 8 repeat orgs$336k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
19

Total granted

$537k
$281k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-13%

Still filing today

75%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2024 · $175k · revenue +29%
  • SP
    SUNSHINE PLACE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $114k · revenue +397%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    2× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • UO
    Univ of WI Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • UO
    Univ of Wisconsin Found
    one grant, 2021 · $65k
  • BL
    BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
2
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
3
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
6
Goodwill Industries of Metropolitan Chicago Inc

Goodwill industries of metropolitan chicago, inc. ("goodwill-chicago") is a nonstock, not-for-profit illinois corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock,…

Human Services
7
Goodwill Manufacturing Inc

Goodwill manufacturing, inc. ("goodwill manufacturing") is a nonstock, not-for-profit wisconsin corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock, not-for-profit…

Employment
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin Community Physicians Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Wingra School Inc

In service of learning, we practice responsive and progressive education, and strive for equity. in service of the whole person, we embrace unique gifts, experiences, and relationships. in service of social justice, we foster…

Education
12
Milwaukee Center for Independence Inc

Milwaukee center for independence, inc. (mcfi) partners with people of all abilities to advance their total health with a vision of creating healthy and hopeful communities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Inc Diocese of Madison; the most unlike its peers is Sun Prairie Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMMIT CHURCH INC: $96,000 · OtherSUMMIT CHURCH INCUniv of WI Hospital Foundation: $90,000 · OtherUniv of WI Hospital FoundationUniv of Wisconsin Found: $65,000 · OtherUniv of Wisconsin FoundBETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHabitat for Humanity Dane Co: $15,000 · Other+13 more: $72,000 · Other+13 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $175,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUND…SUN PRAIRIE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · EducationSUN PRAIRIE EDUCATION FOUNDAT…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSUNSHINE PLACE INC: $113,500 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE PLACE INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $50,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIO…Young Men's Christian Association of Dane County Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Asso…GILDA'S CLUB MADISON WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesGILDA'S CLUB MADISON WISCO…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentTELLURIAN INC: $21,500 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$384,000Education$245,000Human Services$218,500Youth Development$67,500Health$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUNSHINE PLACE INC: $113,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSUN PRAIRIE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Dane County Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTELLURIAN INC: $21,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB MADISON WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIGHT STEP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUN PRAIRIE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Dane County Inc ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIAN INC ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB MADISON WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds RIGHT STEP INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Dane County IncWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Dane County Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Greywolf Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Edward Jones Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mielcarek Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mielcarek Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mielcarek Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mielcarek Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mielcarek Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph