Skip to content

· Public charity

Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency

Empowering people to change their lives and exit poverty by providing vital services and community leadership

$22M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$10MCommunity Improvement$2.7MHuman Services$630k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $3,917,096, the rows itemized in this filing. The $21,990,694 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,073,598 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $127k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.6M
$49,989
Median grant
1
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POLK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$2,700,000
POLK COUNTY FAMILY & COMMUNITY OUTREACH DEPARTMENT$925,013
CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY$65,000
RECOVERY OUTREACH COMMUNITY CENTER$62,130
SEED OF FAITH MINISTRIES$49,989
SILVERTON SHELTERING SERVICES$40,030
SABLE HOUSE$27,500
SAFETY COMPASS$27,434
ST FRANCIS SHELTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAFETY COMPASS: $53k → 14%SAFETY COMPASS: $37k → 14%SAFETY COMPASS: $27k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $177k → 14%NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $120k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $80k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $80k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $65k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $65k → 14%NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $61k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $60k → 14%NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $60k → 14%NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $57k → 14%NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $55k → 14%NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $55k → 14%NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $55k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $43k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $40k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 17 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$11M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+36%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +20% · 53% of their budget
  • CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $630k · revenue +186%
  • SS
    SILVERTON SHELTERING SERVICES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $547k · revenue +637% · 71% of their budget

Funded once

  • MV
    MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY HOMELESS ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • SH
    SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • LI
    LOVE INC OF NORTH MARION COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Wellness Collective

Mental health, drug abuse support. Operating a day-shelter and inclement weather shelter serving unhoused individuals in Newberg.

Health
2
Restoration House Inc

Restoration House provides save, supervised housing for men with significant behavioral health needs, creating a stable environment where structure, accountability, and wraparound services support personal growth and long-term recovery.…

Health
3
Operation Nightwatch - Portland

Operation Nightwatch provides nighttime hospitality for Portland's unhoused population. For a few evenings a week, staff and volunteers at thehospitality center provide a safe place, food, socks, blankets, medical care, and welcome our…

Health
4
Central Oregon Villages

Central oregon villages mission is to advocate for and provide safe and secure shelter, housing and related services in central oreogn for the unhoused populations or at risk of becoming unhoused.

Housing & Shelter
5
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
6
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
7
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
8
Home Share Oregon

To connect homeowners with a spare bedroom to rent and home seekers in need of affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
9
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
10
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
11
Selah Place of Oregon Co Inc

Qualified for voca grant to fund program for shelter and services for victims of domestic and sexual violence

Crime & Legal
12
Samaritan House Inc

Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Hope and Safety; the most unlike its peers is Mano a Mano. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POLK COUNTY FAMILY & COMMUNITY OUTREACH DEPARTMENT: $3,518,468 · OtherPOLK COUNTY FAMILY & COMMUNITY OUTREACH DE…SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY: $458,645 · OtherSALEM HOUSING AUTHORITYST FRANCIS SHELTER: $453,028 · OtherST FRANCIS SHELTERSEED OF FAITH MINISTRIES: $264,708 · Other+6 more: $353,679 · Other+6 morePOLK CDC: $2,700,000 · Community ImprovementPOLK CDCA RAY OF HOPE TODAY: $521,239 · Community ImprovementA RAY OF HOPE TODAYSALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK: $1,100,824 · Housing & ShelterSALEM INTERFAITH …SILVERTON SHELTERING SERVICES: $546,814 · Housing & ShelterSILVERTON SHELTER…SABLE HOUSE: $461,837 · Housing & ShelterSABLE HOUSECHURCH AT THE PARK: $1,685,911 · ReligionCHURCH AT THE …WOMEN AT THE WELL GRACE HOUSE: $70,350 · Religion+1 more: $15,000 · ReligionCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $630,252 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR…NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC: $462,745 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST …SAFETY COMPASS: $117,388 · Human ServicesSAFETY COM…RECOVERY OUTREACH COMMUNITY CENTER: $161,890 · HealthMICRONESIAN ISLANDER COMMUNITY: $61,486 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,048,528Community Improvement$3,221,239Housing & Shelter$2,109,475Religion$1,771,261Human Services$1,210,385Health$161,890Arts & Culture$61,486

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPOLK CDC: $2,700,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetSALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK: $1,100,824 over 7y, 53% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $630,252 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetSILVERTON SHELTERING SERVICES: $546,814 over 7y, 71% of budgetA RAY OF HOPE TODAY: $521,239 over 3y, 56% of budgetNORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC: $462,745 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSABLE HOUSE: $461,837 over 9y, 30% of budgetST FRANCIS SHELTER: $453,028 over 9y, 11% of budgetRECOVERY OUTREACH COMMUNITY CENTER: $161,890 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY: $146,768 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSAFETY COMPASS: $117,388 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetWOMEN AT THE WELL GRACE HOUSE: $70,350 over 5y, 11% of budgetMICRONESIAN ISLANDER COMMUNITY: $61,486 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetLOVE INC OF NORTH MARION COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMano A Mano: $10,580 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POLK CDC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH AT THE PARK ↗
  • Who funds SALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY ↗
  • Who funds SILVERTON SHELTERING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds A RAY OF HOPE TODAY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SABLE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERY OUTREACH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SAFETY COMPASS ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN AT THE WELL GRACE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MICRONESIAN ISLANDER COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds LOVE INC OF NORTH MARION COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Mano A Mano ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maps Community FoundationOR34.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maps Community Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Willamette Health Council · Marion-Polk Food Share Inc · United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · Salem Health · The Salem Foundation · Evergreen Charitable Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · Womens Foundation of Oregon · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Center for Hope and Safety: 68% of income from government
  • Sable House: 50% of income from government
  • Safety Compass: 25% of income from government
  • Micronesian Islander Community: 25% of income from government
  • Salem Interfaith Hospitality Network: 25% of income from government
  • Polk Cdc: 20% of income from government
  • Northwest Human Services Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Church at the Park: 12% of income from government
  • United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency’s filings →

More from the funding graph