· Private foundation
Evergreen Charitable Trust
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Liberty House | $6,555 |
| Church at the Park | $2,500 |
| Center for Hope and Safety | $1,432 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–26, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LIBERTY HOUSE6× · 2021–2026 · $8k · revenue +9%
CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY6× · 2019–2026 · $8k · revenue +131%- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CORVALLIS INC4× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF THE SALEM SENIOR CENTERone grant, 2019 · $51k · revenue +2%
- FFFAMILY FOREST FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +94%
- CTCHILDRENS THEATRE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.
We provide community members facing homlessness with chelter, resurces, and advoccy to create a strong and thriving widbey island.
At United Way of the Columbia-Willamette (UWCW), we envision an Oregon and Southwest Washington where every child and family - regardless of geography, race, or family incomehas a stable foundation and access to the resources and support…
The mission of squareone villages is to create democratic communities with homes that are permanently affordable and environmentally sustainable.
Building brighter futures with children and families.
Over the next five years, portland trails will work to transform greater portland into a regional hub of connectivity and sustainability. by facilitating the expansion and enhancement of our trail network, we will foster inclusive…
To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.
To provide families and individuals experiencing homelessness temporary emergency shelter with intensive case management support while they work toward the goal of safe, stable and affordable housing.
The center for regional prosperity will improve the quality of life for southern maine residents, with a focus on expanding economic opportunities, preserving natural resources, improving public health, and promoting education and planning…
Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Gilbert House Children's Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Family Forest Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SALEM SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHURCH AT THE PARK ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CORVALLIS INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILLAMETTE HERITAGE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE GILBERT HOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SALEM POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
- Who funds SALEM PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TEENPACT LEADERSHIP SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN AT THE WELL GRACE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ISAAC'S ROOM ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HUB ↗
- Who funds MID-VALLEY LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SALEM SYMPHONIC WINDS DBA SALEM CONCERT BAND ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Maps Community Foundation · Willamette Health Council · The Salem Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Salem Health · United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency · W Walton Decd Charitable Trust · Pioneer Trust Bank Na Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Evergreen Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
- Center for Hope and Safety — 68% of income from government
- Liberty House — 23% of income from government
- Northwest Hub — 16% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Corvallis Inc — 16% of income from government
- Northwest Human Services Inc — 15% of income from government
- Church at the Park — 12% of income from government
- United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley — 6% of income from government
- Isaac's Room — 5% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- The Willamette Heritage Center — 0% of income from government
- Mid-Valley Literacy Center — 0% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Evergreen Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Evergreen Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.