Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Mid Florida Homeless Coalition Inc

To promote partnerships that will reduce and prevent homelessness in citrus, hernando, lake, and sumter counties.

$610k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$444k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$2.3MPhilanthropy$695kHealth$498kCommunity Improvement$207kReligion$171kPublic Benefit$123kHousing & Shelter$95kFood & Nutrition$43kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $126k
  • $250k+1 grant · $444k
$14,164
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL$443,603
THE SALVATION ARMY OF LAKE & SUM$125,749
UNITED WAY OF LAKE & SUMTER COUNTIE$14,164
SALVARE INC DBA DAWN CENTER OF$12,150
THE SALVATION ARMY OF HERNANDO$11,733
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $444k → 12%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $342k → 12%BLACK DIAMOND FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $217k → 12%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $208k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE ST PETER: $87k → 12%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $44k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE ST PETE: $41k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE ST PETE: $23k → 12%DAYSTAR LIFE CENTER: $21k → 17%DAYSTAR LIFE CENTER: $15k → 17%DAYSTAR LIFE CENTER: $7k → 17%LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $57k → 10%LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $42k → 10%LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 11 repeat orgs$486k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$3.7M
$486k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+7%

Still filing today

82%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyReligionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +257%
  • LB
    Lifestream Behavioral Center Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $238k · revenue +31%
  • SI
    SALVARE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $221k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CC
    CITRUS COUNTY FOSTER PARENT ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • RA
    REFUGE AT JUMPER CREEK INC
    one grant, 2017 · $171k · revenue -49% · 76% of their budget
  • BD
    BLACK DIAMOND FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Haven of Lake and Sumter Counties Inc

To provide temporary shelter, support, and services to domestic violence and sexual assault victims and their children. to educate the public about issues in relation to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
2
Suncoast Center Inc

For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…

Health
3
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
4
Flagler Ecumenical Social Service Center Inc

The mission of the Family Life Center is to provide compassionate support to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence through advocacy, crisis intervention, and community awareness.

5
The Spring of Tampa Bay Inc

The Spring of Tampa Bay prevents domestic violence, protects victims and promotes change in lives, families and communities.

6
Christian Care Center Inc

Transformed lives leading to stronger families and real life in Christ

Human Services
7
Haven in Lee County Inc

The mission of haven is to help people heal from abuse as we work to end domestic violence and sexual assault through community education, intervention, and primary prevention.

8
Life Crisis Center Inc

To improve the quality of life in our community through crisis intervention and violence prevention.

Human Services
9
Lakes Crisis and Resource Center

Fostering safety, hope and healing through advocacy, intervention and education; direct services for those affectede by domestic violence, abused children, sexual assault victims and general crimes; shelter for women and children; youth…

Human Services
10
Lake County Crisis Center

A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.

11
The Road Home

The primary mission is to help individuals and families step out of homelessness and back into the community in salt lake county. the road home meets this mission by providing housing-focused, emergency shelter programs, along with…

Human Services
12
Seminole County Domestic Violence Association

Family Resource Centers mission is to end domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking by affording victims and survivors security by Changing and Saving Lives Daily.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Citrus County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $806,011 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYUNITED WAY OF CITRUS COUNTY INC — $580,685 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CITRUS COUNTY INCCITRUS COUNTY FOSTER PARENT ASSOCIATION INC — $250,000 · OtherCITRUS COUNTY FOSTER PARENT ASSOCIATION INCLAKE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS — $122,724 · OtherLAKE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSCITRUS COUNTY ABUSE SHELTER ASSOCIA — $99,231 · Other+1 more — $10,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC — $1,254,398 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELL…CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC — $151,023 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBUR…LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $107,184 · Human ServicesLAKE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC+2 more — $68,012 · Human ServicesSALVARE INC — $221,031 · Community ImprovementFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementREALTORS ASSOCIATION OF LAKE & SUMTER COUNTIES INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementLifestream Behavioral Center Inc — $237,654 · HealthREFUGE AT JUMPER CREEK INC — $171,130 · ReligionUnited Way of Lake and Sumter Counties Inc — $89,402 · Philanthropy
Other$1,868,651Human Services$1,580,617Community Improvement$251,031Health$237,654Religion$171,130Philanthropy$89,402

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOUTH PINELLAS INC — $1,254,398 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CITRUS COUNTY INC — $580,685 over 6y, 11% of budgetLifestream Behavioral Center Inc — $237,654 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSALVARE INC — $221,031 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetREFUGE AT JUMPER CREEK INC — $171,130 over 1y, 76% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC — $151,023 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLAKE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $107,184 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCITRUS COUNTY ABUSE SHELTER ASSOCIA — $99,231 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetUnited Way of Lake and Sumter Counties Inc — $89,402 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetDAYSTAR LIFE CENTER INC — $43,012 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBLACK DIAMOND FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREALTORS ASSOCIATION OF LAKE & SUMTER COUNTIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · US Family Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mid Florida Homeless Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Salvare Inc55% of income from government
  • Lifestream Behavioral Center Inc5% of income from government
  • United Way of Lake and Sumter Counties Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mid Florida Homeless Coalition Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mid Florida Homeless Coalition Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph