Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael R & Kathleen B Linburn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.2MReligion$689kHuman Services$403kEducation$213kHealth$89kRecreation & Sports$23kEnvironment$11kSocial Science$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$783k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE$5,000
ST SEBASTIAN ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
THE CITY GARDENS CLUB OF NYC$500
CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $373k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $1k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $1k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $1k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $1k → 17%SEARCH & CARE INC: $150k → 17%SEARCH & CARE INC: $11k → 17%SEARCH & CARE INC: $7k → 17%SEARCH & CARE INC: $975 → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $65k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $37k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $32k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $30k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $16k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $6k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $6k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $5k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 34 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
27

Total granted

$2.6M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+28%

Still filing today

68%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +58%
  • SA
    SEARCH AND CARE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $169k · revenue +38%
  • DF
    DANIEL FERRO VOCAL PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $27k · revenue +2% · 70% of their budget

Funded once

  • SC
    SAMARITAN CENTER AT VOORHIES
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • HB
    HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SM
    ST MARTIN IN THE FIELDS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
2
New York Studio School

The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)

—
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco University High School; the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,065,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTCLARION MUSIC SOCIETY: $56,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $19,050 · Arts & CultureCHURCH OF THE INCARNATION: $674,042 · OtherCHURCH OF THE INCARNATIONDOMINICAN ACADEMY: $165,000 · OtherDOMINICAN ACADEMYSEARCH CARE INC: $54,890 · Other+38 more: $141,200 · Other+38 moreHEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $200,500 · Human ServicesHEALTH ADVOCATES…SEARCH AND CARE INC: $168,725 · Human ServicesSEARCH AND CARE …+2 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $15,000 · EducationTHE SPENCE SCHOOL: $9,000 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITY: $5,300 · EducationTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $4,000 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationThe Browning School: $2,000 · EducationBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $26,000 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR FUND: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsCITY GARDENS CLUB OF NEW YORK CITY: $10,900 · Environment
Arts & Culture$1,140,050Other$1,035,132Human Services$374,225Education$37,300Health$26,000Recreation & Sports$21,500Environment$10,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,065,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $200,500 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetSEARCH AND CARE INC: $168,725 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetCLARION MUSIC SOCIETY: $56,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetDANIEL FERRO VOCAL PROGRAM INC: $27,300 over 4y, 70% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY GARDENS CLUB OF NEW YORK CITY: $10,900 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetSCYC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetTHE SPENCE SCHOOL: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $5,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budget122 EAST 66TH STREET FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDancing Classrooms Inc: $3,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER REFERRAL CENTER INC: $2,600 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Browning School: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEEKMAN PLACE ASSOCIATION INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COSMOPOLITAN CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILHARMONIA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAHOON MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEARCH AND CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARION MUSIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL FERRO VOCAL PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CITY GARDENS CLUB OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds SCYC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPENCE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds 122 EAST 66TH STREET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS ↗
  • Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds Dancing Classrooms Inc ↗
  • Who funds KATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER REFERRAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds The Browning School ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds BEEKMAN PLACE ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Hoerle Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael R & Kathleen B Linburn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael R & Kathleen B Linburn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Cahoon Museum of American Art Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Michael R & Kathleen B Linburn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Michael R & Kathleen B Linburn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael R & Kathleen B Linburn’s filings →

More from the funding graph