· Private foundation
Michael J Connell Foundation Michael J Connell Charities Lte
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $295k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $662k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION | $142,000 |
| FIVE ACRES | $80,000 |
| MONTANA SHAKESPEARE IN THE PARKS | $70,000 |
| CASA OF LOS ANGELES | $60,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA | $60,000 |
| ALEXANDRIA HOUSE | $50,000 |
| MUSIIQUE | $50,000 |
| READING PARTNERS | $50,000 |
| BITTER ROOT | $50,000 |
| EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS | $50,000 |
| PASADENA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC | $40,000 |
| CONCERNED RESOURCES & ENVIRONMENTAL WORKERS | $40,000 |
| PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| A NOISE WITHIN | $35,000 |
| ARROYOS & FOOTHILLS CONSERVANCY | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $584k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +14%
- BRBITTER ROOT LAND TRUST4× · 2018–2025 · $325k · revenue +124%
- AFARROYOS & FOOTHILLS CONSERVANCY6× · 2019–2025 · $315k · revenue +403%
Funded once
- RSRANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDENone grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -8%
- VSVALUE SCHOOLSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +40%
- OBOutward Bound Adventuresgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $45k · revenue +570%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…
The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.
Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.
To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
The child educational center's mission is to ignite joy, curiosity and compassion through innovative children's programs for all.
To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.
Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
South central los angeles regional center, (sclarc), believes special needs deserve special attention. we are committed to the provision of culturally sensitive services which enhance the inherent strengths of the family and enable…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young & Healthy and the most unlike its peers is The Corner Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BITTER ROOT LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds ARROYOS & FOOTHILLS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN ↗
- Who funds DON BOSCO TECHNICAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDES ↗
- Who funds EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS ↗
- Who funds A Noise Within ↗
- Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANTAEUS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds THE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds Pasadena Conservatory of Music ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Concerned Resource & Environmental Workers ↗
- Who funds Harmony Project ↗
- Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
- Who funds YOUNG & HEALTHY ↗
- Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds WHY FORESTS MATTER ↗
- Who funds REDISCOVER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MONTANA TROUT UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
- Who funds CAMERATA PACIFICA ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA ↗
- Who funds THE COLBURN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HOLLENBECK PALMS ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds MuseIque ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds VALUE SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES CHILDREN'S CHORUS ↗
- Who funds Outward Bound Adventures ↗
- Who funds MARIANNE FROSTIG CTR OF EDU THERAPY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pasadena Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Pasadena Showcase House For The Arts · The Green Foundation · Ann Peppers Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Rotary Club of Pasadena Foundation · Helen and Will Webster Foundation · John Jewett & Helen Chandler Garland Fou Ndation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Michael J Connell Foundation Michael J Connell Charities Lte funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Michael J Connell Foundation Michael J Connell Charities Lte?
Find your warmest path to Michael J Connell Foundation Michael J Connell Charities Lte through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.