Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael Gidwitz Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$301kEducation$123kHuman Services$81kAnimals$53kPhilanthropy$35kReligion$15kArts & Culture$9kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$526k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$10,000
NEW EYES FOR THE NEEDY$10,000
WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION$10,000
BROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED$6,000
ST GERMAIN SCHOOL$6,000
ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CO KEYSER FAMILY PEDIATRIC CANCER CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MAYO FOUNDATION$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS$5,000
PAWS CHICAGO$5,000
MARION TREE OF ST GERMAINE$4,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN CHICAGO$4,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,000
GASTRO-INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$630k · 33 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -31% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
8

Total granted

$630k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-31%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    New Eyes for the Needy Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +44%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +12%
  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CURE IT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • JM
    John McNicholas Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -92%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
2
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
3
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
4
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
5
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
6
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
The Institute for Cancer Research

To prevail over cancer, marshaling heart and mind in bold scientific discovery, pioneering prevention and compassionate care.

Health
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
10
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation

To optimize philanthropy in support of the mission and future of the children's hospital of chicago medical center.

Health
11
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
12
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is La Caccina. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL: $90,000 · OtherBROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOLWHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION: $47,500 · OtherWHEELCHAIR FOUNDATIONADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CO KEYSER FAMILY PEDIATRIC CANCER CENTER: $45,000 · OtherADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CO KEYSER FAMILY PEDIATRIC CANCER CENTERNew Eyes for the Needy Inc: $41,900 · OtherNew Eyes for the Needy IncMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $41,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INCSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $25,500 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherST GERMAINE SCHOOL: $21,000 · Other+21 more: $125,680 · Other+21 morePAWS CHICAGO: $34,500 · AnimalsPAWS CHIC…TREE HOUSE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $14,000 · AnimalsTREE HOUS…The Anti-Cruelty Society: $4,000 · AnimalsThe Anti-…+1 more: $157 · AnimalsHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $34,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $7,422 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $15,000 · HealthGASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $9,600 · HealthBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation: $6,200 · HealthPediatric Oncology Treasure Chest: $19,500 · Human ServicesLESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterLA CACCINA: $1,387 · Arts & Culture
Other$487,580Animals$52,657Education$47,422Health$40,800Human Services$19,500Housing & Shelter$10,000Arts & Culture$1,387

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew Eyes for the Needy Inc: $41,900 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $34,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $34,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPediatric Oncology Treasure Chest: $19,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTREE HOUSE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $14,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $9,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $7,422 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation: $6,200 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CURE IT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLA CACCINA: $1,387 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetJohn McNicholas Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWEST ISLIP BREAST CANCER COALITION FOR LONG ISLAND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetANIMAL CARE LEAGUE: $157 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New Eyes for the Needy Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds Pediatric Oncology Treasure Chest ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds TREE HOUSE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CURE IT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
  • Who funds LA CACCINA ↗
  • Who funds John McNicholas Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WEST ISLIP BREAST CANCER COALITION FOR LONG ISLAND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael Gidwitz Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael Gidwitz Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Michael Gidwitz Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Michael Gidwitz Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael Gidwitz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph