Skip to content
Michael a Mary Louise & Christine L Glauber Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Michael a Mary Louise & Christine L Glauber Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$142kCrime & Legal$62kHuman Services$27kEducation$25kReligion$10kYouth Development$10kInternational$10kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$914k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jasper County CASA$25,350
Mercy Health Foundation$25,000
Lafayette House$6,000
JoplinRegionalMedicalSchoolAlliance$5,000
Friends of St Avips$3,000
Toby Keith Foundation OK Kids Korral$1,000
McCune Brooks Health Foundation$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%The HUB Houston: $11k → 16%Toby Keith Foundation OK Kids Korral: $1k → 16%JoplinRegionalMedicalSchoolAlliance: $5k → 15%Breast Cancer Foundation of the Ozarks: $5k → 15%Jasper County CASA: $15k → 18%Bright Futures Foundation: $10k → 7%The HUB Houston: $10k → 16%JoplinRegionalMedicalSchoolAlliance: $5k → 15%Lafayette House: $14k → 18%St Clair of Assisi: $10k → 7%JoplinRegionalMedicalSchoolAlliance: $5k → 15%Jasper County CASA: $10k → 18%Mercy Health Foundation: $50k → 15%Jasper County CASA: $10k → 18%Jasper County CASA: $25k → 15%Life Choices: $10k → 18%Mercy Health Foundation: $25k → 15%Joplin Area Catholic Schools: $10k → 18%Mercy Health Foundation: $25k → 15%Lafayette House: $6k → 18%Big Brothers Big Sisters of Jasper & Newton County: $10k → 15%Lafayette House: $2k → 18%Mercy Health Foundation: $4k → 15%Lafayette House: $2k → 18%Lafayette House: $4k → 15%Chidren's Center: $1k → 18%Friends of St Avips: $3k → 15%Childrens Center of SW MO: $1k → 18%Friends of St Avips: $3k → 15%Missouri Southern Foundation: $200 → 18%McCune Brooks Health Foundation: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$236k · 7 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$236k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+72%

Still filing today

86%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCrime & LegalEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JASPER COUNTY CASA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +22%
  • FS
    FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue +0%
  • TH
    THE HUB HOUSTON INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $21k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JASPER AND NEWTON COUNTIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +83%
  • L
    LIFECHOICES
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • JA
    Joplin Area Catholic Schools
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
2
Life Choices Medical Center

Christian organization offering a hopeful future by empowering women and men to make life-affirming decisions

Human Services
3
Ms Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Prevention of child abuse

Civil Rights
4
Robertson County Child Advocacy Cen

Effective prosecution of child abuses, providing therapy and education for the abused, and providing a safe haven for the abused.

Crime & Legal
5
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
6
Choices for Women Resource Center Jefferson County

Life choices exists to educate, support, and empower women and families facing unexpected pregnancies in jefferson county. we provide accurate information, free services, and practical support with a holistic and compassionate approach.

Human Services
7
Lasalle County Childrens Advocacy Center

Advocacy and care of physically and sexually abused children in lasalle county. we work with the court system in determining the best placement for children.

Crime & Legal
8
Jasper Area Family Services Center Inc

The Center was organized in March 2002 to coordinate comprehensive community resources at one site to empower families by providing services that develop skills and resources needed to prepare their children for success in a competitive…

Human Services
9
Children's Safety Center

Child abuse victim assistance

Crime & Legal
10
Midwest Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

Assistence to women in crisis pregnancies.

Health
11
Jacobs Hope

To Provide Medical Supervised Care to Drug Exposed Newborns.

Health
12
Family Justice Center of Central Louisiana Inc

Seek to stop family violence, make victims safer, hold batters accountable, and provide long-term support for survivors and children through collaboration and coordinated services. We will provide legal advice, medical services, and…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Self Help Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mccune-Brooks Health Care Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mercy Health Foundation: $104,000 · OtherMercy Health FoundationFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC: $27,220 · OtherFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INCJoplin Area Catholic Schools: $10,000 · OtherJoplin Area Catholic SchoolsBRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATIONSt Clair of Assisi: $10,000 · OtherSt Clair of AssisiFRIENDS OF ST AVIPS: $6,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherJASPER COUNTY CASA: $60,350 · Crime & LegalJASPER COUNTY CASA+1 more: $2,000 · Crime & LegalTHE HUB HOUSTON INC: $21,000 · HealthTHE HUB HOUS…LIFECHOICES: $10,000 · HealthLIFECHOICES+1 more: $500 · HealthJOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JASPER AND NEWTON COUNTIES INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$168,220Crime & Legal$62,350Health$31,500Education$15,200Youth Development$10,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJASPER COUNTY CASA: $60,350 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC: $27,220 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HUB HOUSTON INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JASPER AND NEWTON COUNTIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetLIFECHOICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST AVIPS: $6,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMCCUNE-BROOKS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W R Corley Memorial T…Community Foundation …Mercy Health Southwes…Arvest FoundationFredrick G and Rebeka…Jean Jack and Mildred…Ruth I Kolpin Foundat…Freeman R Johnson Tru…Cragin Joy Spiva Char…The Farber FoundationThe Bramlage and Will…Charities Aid Foundat…
W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust ServicesMO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Mercy Health Southwest Missourikansas Communities · Arvest Foundation · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · Ruth I Kolpin Foundation · Freeman R Johnson Trust · Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust · The Farber Foundation · The Bramlage and Willcoxon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael a Mary Louise & Christine L Glauber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael a Mary Louise & Christine L Glauber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael a Mary Louise & Christine L Glauber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home