Skip to content
Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of miami cancer institute at baptist health, inc.

$333k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.3MHealth$684kArts & Culture$223kReligion$33k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $315,700, the rows itemized in this filing. The $332,700 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $202k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$80M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$99,500
SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FDN$40,000
NEW WORLD SYMPHONY$37,500
PROMISE FUND OF FLORIDA INC$25,000
BRCASTRONG CORP$25,000
BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC$25,000
LIVE LIKE BELLA INC$15,000
SOFIA'S HOPE INC$14,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$10,000
THE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION INC$10,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC$8,000
NOT MY DAUGHTER INC$6,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER: $15k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 14 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$3.4M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+9%

Still filing today

93%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2.3M · revenue +57%
  • NW
    NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $221k · revenue +48%
  • PF
    PROMISE FUND OF FLORIDA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +104%
  • ZP
    ZERO PROSTATE CANCER
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +9%
  • PA
    PHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Brca Research and Cure Alliance
Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
7
Pano Koumantaros Cancer Research Fund Inc
Philanthropy
8
International Cancer Advocacy Network

Ican's mission is two-fold: to optimize stage iv cancer patient survival and work to attain the highest possible quality of life. ican assists stage iv cancer patients with 1) direct patient navigation and customized advocacy services; 2)…

Philanthropy
9
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
10
Florida Breast Cancer Coalition Research Foundation Inc

To save the lives of those impacted by breast cancer by supporting sscientific research, community education, public policy through advocacy, and community-based organizations.

Health
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
SISTER2SISTER

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death after lung cancer in women in the us overall, but its the leading cause of cancer death in black and hispanic women. geographical disparities in breast cancer incidence and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Institute of Contemporary Art Miami Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,312,100 · EducationFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCNEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC: $220,833 · EducationNEW WORLD SYMPHONY INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $197,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY IN…PROMISE FUND OF FLORIDA INC: $150,000 · HealthPROMISE FUND OF FLORIDA IN…Live Like Bella Inc: $55,000 · HealthLive Like Bella IncBRCA Strong Corp: $48,900 · HealthBRCA Strong CorpSOFIA'S HOPE INC: $45,500 · HealthSOFIA'S HOPE INCThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $40,000 · Health+7 more: $105,700 · Health+7 moreTEMPLE BETH AM: $60,500 · OtherAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $30,000 · OtherThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group: $11,967 · OtherTHE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherTOTAL HEALTH INFORMATION SERVICES LLC: $7,500 · OtherINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INC: $25,000 · Arts & CulturePHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human Services
Education$2,532,933Health$842,600Other$119,967Arts & Culture$43,000Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,312,100 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetNEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC: $220,833 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $197,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROMISE FUND OF FLORIDA INC: $150,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetLive Like Bella Inc: $55,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBRCA Strong Corp: $48,900 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetSOFIA'S HOPE INC: $45,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOT MY DAUGHTER INC: $12,700 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTHE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget305 Pink Pack Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baptist Health South …University of MiamiThe Miami Foundation …Mightycause Charitabl…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Baptist Health South Florida IncFL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baptist Health South Florida Inc · University of Miami · The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Phillip and Patricia Frost Museum of Science Inc: 1% of income from government
  • New World Symphony Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home