Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Mi Poder

MI PODER's mission is to promote social welfare, including but not limited to, strengthening the michigan latinx voice and the capacity for leadership to mobilize its constituency and increase participation in democratic processes.

$263k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MI$52,140
LATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS$30,440
CENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC$30,000
DETROIT HISPANCI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$30,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY$30,000
HISPANIC TECHNOLOGY & COMMUNITY CENTER$30,000
HISPANIC AMERICAN COUNCIL INC$30,000
VOCES$30,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MI: $52k → 11%VOCES: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latino Political Network
2
Hispanic Council

Education

Community Improvement
3
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
4
Latin American Chamber of Commerce

To foster relationships between hispanic and non-hispanic business, associations, individuals and goverment to create new business opportunities

Community Improvement
5
Latinas On the Plaza
6
Latino Family Services Inc

Latino Family Services LFS is a community agency which provides and coordinates comprehensive human services to residents of Wayne County with particular emphasis on its Latino residents. These services will enhance the quality of life for…

7
Latinas Usa
Community Improvement
8
The Alliance for Community Wellness Dba La Familia Counseling Services

La Familia Counseling Service is an inclusive Latino community-based, multi-cultural organization committed to strengthening the emotional wellness of individuals and the preservation of families.

9
Latino Americanos Unidos Del Bronx Ny Inc
Human Services
10
Lupec

Empower the Latino Community

Human Services
11
Corazon Latino
Arts & Culture
12
Centro Comunitario Hispano- Americano Inc

To enhance the well-being and integration of the hispanic community. this is done through promoting education, enhancing multicultural understanding, advocating for justice, developing hispanic leadership, and encouraging participation.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voces and the most unlike its peers is Hispanic Technology & Community Center of Greater Flint. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INC — $30,440 · OtherLATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INCJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC — $30,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COU…HISPANIC AMERICAN COUNCIL INC — $30,000 · OtherHISPANIC AMERICAN COUNCIL INCHISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $52,140 · Human ServicesHISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN…VOCES — $30,000 · Human ServicesVOCESCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRO MULTI…DETROIT HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $30,000 · Community ImprovementDETROIT HISP…HISPANIC TECHNOLOGY & COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FLINT — $30,000 · Public BenefitHISPANIC TEC…
Other$90,440Human Services$82,140Arts & Culture$30,000Community Improvement$30,000Public Benefit$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $52,140 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INC — $30,440 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC — $30,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDETROIT HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHISPANIC TECHNOLOGY & COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FLINT — $30,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetHISPANIC AMERICAN COUNCIL INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVOCES — $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hispanic Federation IncNY21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hispanic Federation Inc · Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation · Dte Energy Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mi Poder funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph