· Public charity
Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation
The DETROIT HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION's mission is to make a difference by creating life changing opportunities for youth and their families.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $416,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $536,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $120,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k7 grants · $240k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $176k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES | $98,000 |
| SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY JUSTICE COURT | $78,000 |
| HISPANIC AMERICAN COUNCIL INC | $36,000 |
| VOCES | $36,000 |
| HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC | $36,000 |
| HISPANIC TECHNOLOGY & COMMUNITY CENTER | $36,000 |
| CENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC | $36,000 |
| LATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS | $36,000 |
| SOUTHWEST DETROIT COMMUNITY BENEFITS COALITION | $24,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $333k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 88% of Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 10% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $176k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC5× · 2019–2024 · $198k · revenue +259%
- HTHISPANIC TECHNOLOGY & COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FLINT4× · 2021–2024 · $189k · revenue +60%
- LALATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $116k · revenue +951%
Funded once
1 Michigan for the Global Majorityone grant, 2020 · $205k · revenue -91% · 56% of their budget- ICISLAMIC CENTER OF DETROIT INCone grant, 2020 · $144k
- ABAFRICAN BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND SOCIAL AFFAIRSone grant, 2020 · $144k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support and improve the well being of latinx families in michigan, with emphasis on low income latinx families in washtenaw county.
Dream of Detroit is combining community organizing with strategic housing and land development to build a healthy community and empower a marginalized neighborhood on the Westside of Detroit.
To serve as a catalyst for systemic change through leadership development, a space of cultural belonging, and reclaiming the Latina narrative, and by seeking to empower Latina leadership by serving as a resource for racial equity,…
The detroit hispanic development corporation's mission is to make a difference by creating life changing opportunities for youth and their families. we are committed to meeting the needs of our community by providing quality, innovative…
To enable african americans and people in need to reach their full human potential
To promote equality and inclusion in society.
None
Michigan roundtable for just communities is a racial and social justice organization whose purpose is eradicate racism, discrimination, and systemic inequities by cultivating multigenerational just and beloved communities.
To build the political and economic power of low and moderate-income detroiters of color through neighborhood-driven community organizing and civic engagement in order to change public policy and communities for the better.
Please provide explanation of organizations mission.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic Center of Western Michigan Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hispanic Technology & Community Center of Greater Flint. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 1 Michigan for the Global Majority ↗
- Who funds CENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC TECHNOLOGY & COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FLINT ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INC ↗
- Who funds VOCES ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL DETROIT ↗
- Who funds Urban Neighborhood Initiatives Inc ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC AMERICAN COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds DETROITERS WORKING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST DETROIT COMMUNITY JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST DETROIT ENVIRONMENTAL VISION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICANS FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Southwest Detroit Community Benefits Coalition ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COMPADRES NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTE ↗
- Who funds AUNTIE NA'S VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN ENVIROMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · Mi Poder · Hispanic Federation Inc · The Skillman Foundation · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation · Wayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Michigan Nonprofit Association
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.